From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:18:56 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx6: disable clock command and print_cpuinfo
 code in SPL
In-Reply-To: <58344258-849d-2eb0-39f4-444178f2953e@denx.de>
References: <1503949586-24936-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de>
 <58344258-849d-2eb0-39f4-444178f2953e@denx.de>
Message-ID: <20170919141856.12fb051a@crub>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Stefano,

On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:54:30 +0200
Stefano Babic sbabic at denx.de wrote:
...
> This patch has some side-effects and breaks some boards. Even if the
> changes are correct, some boards (wandboard, icore are examples) don't
> disable IPU support in SPL. Even if this is useless and generates only a
> bigger footprint.
> 
> In fact, I get :
> 
>        arm:  +   wandboard
> +board/wandboard/built-in.o: In function `setup_display':
> +board/wandboard/wandboard.c:355: undefined reference to `enable_ipu_clock'
> +make[2]: *** [spl/u-boot-spl] Error 1
> +make[1]: *** [spl/u-boot-spl] Error 2
> +make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> 
> 
> Reason is clear: boards have in SPL a setup_display() that calls
> enable_ipu_clock. But it makes no sense to have IPU support in SPL.
> 
> We can fix with a follow-up patch, but this is bad for bisecting. The
> other option is to fix here and disable IPU in spl for the affected
> boards. What you think ?

Sorry for the build breakage, I didn't test with a full imx6 build.
Yes, we shouldn't break bisection. I'll fix and resubmit. Thanks!

--
Anatolij