diff for duplicates of <20170919155603.GB22809@redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index c97d82a..bb47815 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ On Tue, Sep 19 2017 at 11:36am -0400, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote: -> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: -> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: +> On Tue, 2017-09-19@13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: +> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017@03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > If you are still looking at removing the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() calls > > > then I think you are looking in the wrong direction. What kind of problem > > > are you trying to solve? Is it perhaps that there can be a delay between diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 82bf43c..7b96730 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,28 +5,16 @@ "ref\01505747894.2685.6.camel@wdc.com\0" "ref\020170919054308.GA2517@ming.t460p\0" "ref\01505835394.2671.18.camel@wdc.com\0" - "From\0Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE\0" + "From\0snitzer@redhat.com (Mike Snitzer)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE\0" "Date\0Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:56:03 -0400\0" - "To\0Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>\0" - "Cc\0ming.lei@redhat.com <ming.lei@redhat.com>" - linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> - hch@infradead.org <hch@infradead.org> - sagi@grimberg.me <sagi@grimberg.me> - martin.petersen@oracle.com <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org> - axboe@fb.com <axboe@fb.com> - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> - jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - loberman@redhat.com <loberman@redhat.com> - " dm-devel@redhat.com <dm-devel@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Sep 19 2017 at 11:36am -0400,\n" "Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:\n" "\n" - "> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:\n" - "> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:\n" + "> On Tue, 2017-09-19@13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:\n" + "> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017@03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:\n" "> > > If you are still looking at removing the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() calls\n" "> > > then I think you are looking in the wrong direction. What kind of problem\n" "> > > are you trying to solve? Is it perhaps that there can be a delay between\n" @@ -65,4 +53,4 @@ "\n" Mike -ef206cdc6e22661e4eb2779bfe5a3c188f456233c28ec414188cc04df4edd4e6 +609264483e40248628d71b3abf8170b18828d782c613de58a6cbac1450aa7855
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.