diff for duplicates of <20170919160401.GC19830@ming.t460p> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index aae6626..fb32bc7 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:56:03AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: +On Tue, Sep 19, 2017@11:56:03AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19 2017 at 11:36am -0400, > Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote: > -> > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: -> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: +> > On Tue, 2017-09-19@13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: +> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017@03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > > > If you are still looking at removing the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() calls > > > > then I think you are looking in the wrong direction. What kind of problem > > > > are you trying to solve? Is it perhaps that there can be a delay between diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index e3ea6b0..f814d17 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -6,29 +6,17 @@ "ref\020170919054308.GA2517@ming.t460p\0" "ref\01505835394.2671.18.camel@wdc.com\0" "ref\020170919155603.GB22809@redhat.com\0" - "From\0Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE\0" + "From\0ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 1/5] block: don't call blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() in case of BLK_STS_RESOURCE\0" "Date\0Wed, 20 Sep 2017 00:04:02 +0800\0" - "To\0Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>\0" - "Cc\0Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>" - linux-block@vger.kernel.org <linux-block@vger.kernel.org> - hch@infradead.org <hch@infradead.org> - sagi@grimberg.me <sagi@grimberg.me> - martin.petersen@oracle.com <martin.petersen@oracle.com> - linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org> - axboe@fb.com <axboe@fb.com> - linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org> - jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - loberman@redhat.com <loberman@redhat.com> - " dm-devel@redhat.com <dm-devel@redhat.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" - "On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:56:03AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:\n" + "On Tue, Sep 19, 2017@11:56:03AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:\n" "> On Tue, Sep 19 2017 at 11:36am -0400,\n" "> Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> wrote:\n" "> \n" - "> > On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:\n" - "> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:\n" + "> > On Tue, 2017-09-19@13:43 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:\n" + "> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017@03:18:16PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:\n" "> > > > If you are still looking at removing the blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() calls\n" "> > > > then I think you are looking in the wrong direction. What kind of problem\n" "> > > > are you trying to solve? Is it perhaps that there can be a delay between\n" @@ -83,4 +71,4 @@ "-- \n" Ming -9ad4a2c031aedf6d8d7cd9c33b8924724b73fe5be2e1086dfc0d475a16d075dd +2fd255de08dfc546eaa9f55ab079ac1f382db9687bbafea8139e2b4e4ba5c9bf
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.