From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: shared/298 lockdep splat?
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:10:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920211042.GH7112@magnolia> (raw)
Hello list,
Yesterday I tried setting up qemu 2.10 with some (fake) nvdimms backed
by an on-disk file. Midway through a -g auto xfstests run, shared/298
produced the attached dmesg spew. I'll try to have a look later, but
in the meantime I'm doing the 'complain to list, see if anyone bites'
thing. :)
The kernel is 4.14-rc1 without any patches applied.
--D
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.14.0-rc1-fixes #1 Tainted: G W
------------------------------------------------------
loop0/31693 is trying to acquire lock:
(&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock){++++}, at: [<ffffffffa00f1b0c>] xfs_ilock+0x23c/0x330 [xfs]
but now in release context of a crosslock acquired at the following:
((complete)&ret.event){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81326c1f>] submit_bio_wait+0x7f/0xb0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 ((complete)&ret.event){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xab/0x200
wait_for_completion_io+0x4e/0x1a0
submit_bio_wait+0x7f/0xb0
blkdev_issue_zeroout+0x71/0xa0
xfs_bmapi_convert_unwritten+0x11f/0x1d0 [xfs]
xfs_bmapi_write+0x374/0x11f0 [xfs]
xfs_iomap_write_direct+0x2ac/0x430 [xfs]
xfs_file_iomap_begin+0x20d/0xd50 [xfs]
iomap_apply+0x43/0xe0
dax_iomap_rw+0x89/0xf0
xfs_file_dax_write+0xcc/0x220 [xfs]
xfs_file_write_iter+0xf0/0x130 [xfs]
__vfs_write+0xd9/0x150
vfs_write+0xc8/0x1c0
SyS_write+0x45/0xa0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
-> #1 (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++}:
lock_acquire+0xab/0x200
down_write_nested+0x4a/0xb0
xfs_ilock+0x263/0x330 [xfs]
xfs_setattr_size+0x152/0x370 [xfs]
xfs_vn_setattr+0x6b/0x90 [xfs]
notify_change+0x27d/0x3f0
do_truncate+0x5b/0x90
path_openat+0x237/0xa90
do_filp_open+0x8a/0xf0
do_sys_open+0x11c/0x1f0
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbe
-> #0 (&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock){++++}:
up_write+0x1c/0x40
xfs_iunlock+0x1d0/0x310 [xfs]
xfs_file_fallocate+0x8a/0x310 [xfs]
loop_queue_work+0xb7/0x8d0
kthread_worker_fn+0xb9/0x1f0
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock --> &xfs_nondir_ilock_class --> (complete)&ret.event
Possible unsafe locking scenario by crosslock:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
lock((complete)&ret.event);
lock(&(&ip->i_mmaplock)->mr_lock);
unlock((complete)&ret.event);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by loop0/31693:
#0: (&x->wait#16){-...}, at: [<ffffffff810d1858>] complete+0x18/0x60
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 31693 Comm: loop0 Tainted: G W 4.14.0-rc1-fixes #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7c/0xbe
print_circular_bug+0x204/0x310
? graph_unlock+0x70/0x70
check_prev_add+0x401/0x800
? __lock_acquire+0x72a/0x1100
? __lock_acquire+0x534/0x1100
? lock_commit_crosslock+0x3e9/0x5c0
lock_commit_crosslock+0x3e9/0x5c0
complete+0x24/0x60
blk_update_request+0xc2/0x3e0
blk_mq_end_request+0x18/0x80
__blk_mq_complete_request+0x9f/0x170
loop_queue_work+0x51/0x8d0
? kthread_worker_fn+0x96/0x1f0
kthread_worker_fn+0xb9/0x1f0
kthread+0x148/0x180
? loop_get_status64+0x80/0x80
? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
XFS (loop0): EXPERIMENTAL reverse mapping btree feature enabled. Use at your own risk!
XFS (loop0): EXPERIMENTAL reflink feature enabled. Use at your own risk!
XFS (loop0): Mounting V5 Filesystem
XFS (loop0): Ending clean mount
XFS (loop0): Unmounting Filesystem
XFS (pmem3): Unmounting Filesystem
XFS (pmem3): EXPERIMENTAL reverse mapping btree feature enabled. Use at your own risk!
XFS (pmem3): EXPERIMENTAL reflink feature enabled. Use at your own risk!
XFS (pmem3): Mounting V5 Filesystem
XFS (pmem3): Ending clean mount
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-20 21:10 Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-09-20 22:22 ` shared/298 lockdep splat? Dave Chinner
2017-09-21 8:47 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-26 3:51 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-26 7:04 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920211042.GH7112@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.