Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] eventdev: cover letter: ethernet Rx queue event adapter

[Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>]

-----Original Message-----
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:59:25 +0530
> From: Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> To: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com
> CC: gage.eads@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net,
>  harry.van.haaren@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, nipun.gupta@nxp.com,
>  narender.vangati@intel.com, erik.g.carrillo@intel.com,
>  abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com, Nikhil Rao <nikhil.rao@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] eventdev: cover letter: ethernet Rx queue event
>  adapter
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
> 
> Eventdev-based networking applications require a component to dequeue
> packets from NIC Rx queues and inject them into eventdev queues[1]. While
> some platforms (e.g. Cavium Octeontx) do this operation in hardware, other
> platforms use software.
> 
> This patchset introduces an ethernet Rx event adapter that dequeues packets
> from ethernet devices and enqueues them to event devices. This patch is based on
> a previous RFC[2] and supercedes [3], the main difference being that
> this version implements a common abstraction for HW and SW based packet transfers.
> 
> The adapter is designed to work with the EAL service core[4] for SW based
> packet transfers. An eventdev PMD callback is used to determine that SW
> based packet transfer service is required. The application can discover
> and configure the service with a core mask using rte_service APIs.
> 
> The adapter can service multiple ethernet devices and queues. For SW based
> packet transfers each queue is  configured with a servicing weight to
> control the relative frequency with which the adapter polls the queue,
> and the event fields to use when constructing packet events. The adapter
> has two modes for programming an event's flow ID: use a static per-queue
> user-specified value or use the RSS hash.
> 
> A detailed description of the adapter is contained in the header's
> comments.

Hi Nikhil.

Overall this series looks good. The patch specific comments, I will send
on each patches.

Please fix the
1) ./devtools/check-git-log.sh & ./devtools/checkpatches.sh issues with
series
2) I guess for next revision you could split the patches to more fine
granularity with make sure each patch build separately.