From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dx6xO-0007Ud-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:40:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dx6wy-0001FQ-UM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:40:34 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dx6wy-0001EK-Nz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 03:40:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:39:59 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20170927093959.3f61dd36.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <67c13b99-2d44-666b-9328-05917d0fc0dc@redhat.com> References: <20170926180522.68482-1-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <67c13b99-2d44-666b-9328-05917d0fc0dc@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: remove ais from z14 default model-> also for 2.10.1 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Christian Borntraeger , qemu-devel , Alexander Graf , Thomas Huth , Richard Henderson , Michael Roth On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:26:31 +0200 David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 26.09.2017 20:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > We disabled ais for 2.10 lets also remove it from the z14 default model. > > > > Fixes: 3f2d07b3b01e s390x/ais: for 2.10 stable: disable ais facility > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger > > --- > > target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > > index c8dc104..68e6c31 100644 > > --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c > > +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c > > @@ -527,7 +527,6 @@ static uint16_t default_GEN13_GA1[] = { > > #define default_GEN13_GA2 EmptyFeat > > > > static uint16_t default_GEN14_GA1[] = { > > - S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_INT_SUPPRESSION, > > S390_FEAT_INSTRUCTION_EXEC_PROT, > > S390_FEAT_GUARDED_STORAGE, > > S390_FEAT_VECTOR_PACKED_DECIMAL, > > > > Yes, this has to go into stable, otherwise the migration safe stable > model would be changed. > > Apart from that, this looks just fine. So, this should go into stable only, as the patches currently on the list will fix this properly for 2.11, right?