All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:13:21 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170927230042-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506500637-13881-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:23:54PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Hi all:
> 
> We use flow caches based flow steering policy now. This is good for
> connection-oriented communication such as TCP but not for the others
> e.g connectionless unidirectional workload which cares only about
> pps. This calls the ability of supporting changing steering policies
> in tuntap which was done by this series.
> 
> Flow steering policy was abstracted into tun_steering_ops in the first
> patch. Then new ioctls to set or query current policy were introduced,
> and the last patch introduces a very simple policy that select txq
> based on processor id as an example.
> 
> Test was done by using xdp_redirect to redirect traffic generated from
> MoonGen that was running on a remote machine. And I see 37%
> improvement for processor id policy compared to automatic flow
> steering policy.

For sure, if you don't need to figure out the flow hash then you can
save a bunch of cycles.  But I don't think the cpu policy is too
practical outside of a benchmark.

Did you generate packets and just send them to tun? If so, this is not a
typical configuration, is it? With packets coming e.g.  from a real nic
they might already have the hash pre-calculated, and you won't
see the benefit.

> In the future, both simple and sophisticated policy like RSS or other guest
> driven steering policies could be done on top.

IMHO there should be a more practical example before adding all this
indirection. And it would be nice to understand why this queue selection
needs to be tun specific.

> Thanks
> 
> Jason Wang (3):
>   tun: abstract flow steering logic
>   tun: introduce ioctls to set and get steering policies
>   tun: introduce cpu id based steering policy
> 
>  drivers/net/tun.c           | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h |   8 +++
>  2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-27 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-27  8:23 [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] tun: abstract flow steering logic Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] tun: introduce ioctls to set and get steering policies Jason Wang
2017-09-27  8:23 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] tun: introduce cpu id based steering policy Jason Wang
2017-09-27 22:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-09-27 23:25   ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] support changing steering policies in tuntap Willem de Bruijn
2017-09-28  5:02     ` Tom Herbert
2017-09-28  7:53       ` Jason Wang
2017-09-28  7:23     ` Jason Wang
2017-09-28 16:09       ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-09-29  9:41         ` Jason Wang
2017-10-01  3:28         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-09-28  6:50   ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170927230042-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.