From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: Ping for perf patches Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:42:13 -0300 Message-ID: <20170928144212.GA7264@kernel.org> References: <25eec9de-ec47-9651-9fde-3f73e27814f2@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56660 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752357AbdI1OmQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:42:16 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25eec9de-ec47-9651-9fde-3f73e27814f2@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas-Mich Richter Cc: "linux-perf-use." , Jiri Olsa , Hendrik Brueckner , Martin Schwidefsky Em Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:48:16AM +0200, Thomas-Mich Richter escreveu: > Hi all, > > I recently posted a few patches, which probably got lost in the meantime: > > These 2 are for the perf test attr (now test 16): > > - [PATCH 1/2] perf test attr: fix python error on empty result > - [PATCH 2/2] perf test attr: fix ignored test case result > Both have been ack'ed by Jiri. > > The next 2 are s390x specific changes I submitted back in July/August but > need to be reverted and I submitted the reverting patches some week ago: > > - [PATCH 1/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x > - [PATCH 2/2] perf test: fix vmlinux failure on s390x part 2 > > I am not sure if they are still in the review process or if they > got lost? Should I resubmit them? I'm procesing them now, sorry for the delay, I've been doing some other activities, have a backlog of perf patches to review/test/process :-\ - Arnaldo