From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [net-next V2 PATCH 1/5] bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20170929114154.4b5d5918@cakuba> References: <150670281423.23765.8984643281418950330.stgit@firesoul> <150670285218.23765.2480801081343646072.stgit@firesoul> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , mchan@broadcom.com, John Fastabend , peter.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com, Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andy Gospodarek To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.11]:13537 "EHLO mx4.wp.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752453AbdI2SmF (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:42:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <150670285218.23765.2480801081343646072.stgit@firesoul> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:34:12 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > The 'cpumap' is primary used as a backend map for XDP BPF helper > call bpf_redirect_map() and XDP_REDIRECT action, like 'devmap'. > > This patch implement the main part of the map. It is not connected to > the XDP redirect system yet, and no SKB allocation are done yet. > > The main concern in this patch is to ensure the datapath can run > without any locking. This adds complexity to the setup and tear-down > procedure, which assumptions are extra carefully documented in the > code comments. > > V2: make sure array isn't larger than num possible CPUs > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Few trivial nitpicks, hope you don't mind :) > @@ -0,0 +1,555 @@ > +/* bpf/cpumap.c > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Jesper Dangaard Brouer, Red Hat Inc. > + * Released under terms in GPL version 2. See COPYING. > + */ > + > +/* The 'cpumap' is primary used as a backend map for XDP BPF helper > + * call bpf_redirect_map() and XDP_REDIRECT action, like 'devmap'. > + * > + * Unlike devmap which redirect XDP frames out another NIC device, > + * this map type redirect raw XDP frames to another CPU. The remote > + * CPU will do SKB-allocation and call the normal network stack. > + * > + * This is a scalability and isolation mechanism, that allow > + * separating the early driver network XDP layer, from the rest of the > + * netstack, and assigning dedicated CPUs for this stage. This > + * basically allows for 10G wirespeed pre-filtering via bpf. > + */ > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/* > + * General idea: XDP packets getting XDP redirected to another CPU, > + * will maximum be stored/queued for one driver ->poll() call. It is > + * guaranteed that setting flush bit and flush operation happen on > + * same CPU. Thus, cpu_map_flush operation can deduct via this_cpu_ptr() > + * which queue in bpf_cpu_map_entry contains packets. > + */ > + > +#define CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE 8 /* 8 == one cacheline on 64-bit archs */ > +struct xdp_bulk_queue { > + void *q[CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE]; > + unsigned int count; > +}; Out of curiosity - would it make sense to make sure the entire struct fits into a cache line? The comment seems to indicate that the array is sized to fit a cache line, but then there is also the count member... > +/* > + * After xchg pointer to bpf_cpu_map_entry, use the call_rcu() to ... There is a mix for networking and non-networking style comments in this file, is this intentional? > +const struct bpf_map_ops cpu_map_ops = { > + .map_alloc = cpu_map_alloc, > + .map_free = cpu_map_free, > + .map_delete_elem = cpu_map_delete_elem, > + .map_update_elem = cpu_map_update_elem, > + .map_lookup_elem = cpu_map_lookup_elem, > + .map_get_next_key = cpu_map_get_next_key, > +}; > + > + Extra new line. > +/* Runs under RCU-read-side, plus in softirq under NAPI protection. > + * Thus, safe percpu variable access. > + */ > +static int bq_enqueue(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, struct xdp_pkt *xdp_pkt) > +{ > + struct xdp_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(rcpu->bulkq); > + > + if (unlikely(bq->count == CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE)) { > + bq_flush_to_queue(rcpu, bq); > + } Curly brackets not needed.