From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Michael Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Cc: Hongjiang Zhang <honzhan@microsoft.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: GRUB2 missing multiboot2 patches?Re: Only 1 CPU was detected
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:54:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170929135451.GC29100@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.1709291107430.4459@austen3.home>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Michael Young wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Hongjiang Zhang wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Stefan Bader [mailto:stefan.bader@canonical.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 4:49 AM
> > > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>; Hongjiang Zhang
> > > <honzhan@microsoft.com>
> > > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> > > Subject: Re: GRUB2 missing multiboot2 patches?Re: [Xen-devel] Only 1 CPU
> > > was detected
> > >
> > > On 28.09.2017 16:03, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 02:45:38PM +0000, Hongjiang Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > > (XEN) ACPI Error (tbxfroot-0218): A valid RSDP was not found
> > > > > > > [20070126]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Uuh, that is rather bad, I guess.
> > > >
> > > > I am going to assume this is due to not having:
> > > >
> > > > b4d709b6e Use grub-file to figure out whether multiboot2 should be
> > > > used for Xen.gz a8e0f1adf Fix util/grub.d/20_linux_xen.in: Add
> > > > xen_boot command support for aarch64
> > > >
> > > > In the grub that he is using (Ubuntu?)
> > > >
> > > > In other words he is using 'multiboot' instead of 'multiboot2'
> > > >
> > > If this is Ubuntu, my expectation is that this would require Xen 4.9 (which is
> > > part of 17.10 but not yet released) and work on grub2 (which I will very
> > > unlikely have the time for). Debian has not yet moved to Xen 4.9, so I would
> > > doubt that it would work there either.
> > >
> > If Xen 4.9 does not work either, shall I try CentOS 7.13 instead? Or which Linux distribution is recommended?
>
> I think Fedora 27 (currently in beta) is almost there (for x86_64 anyway).
> It does have xen 4.9, but some manual steps are needed to get grub2 working
> using multiboot2. These are
>
> * edit the grub.cfg file to use multiboot2 and module2 rather than multiboot
> and module
It won't generate the stanza.
> * install the grub2-efi-x64-modules package and copy multiboot2.mod and
> relocator.mod from /usr/lib/grub/x86_64-efi to
> /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/x86_64-efi/ (which you probably need to create)
> * add insmod multiboot2 to the relevant section in the grub.cfg file with
> the other insmod lines.
>
> Also watch out for useless sections in the grub.cfg file for a xen config
> file rather than for xen itself.
Sadly not there as the ARM changes broke x86, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486002
>
> I recently got xen working doing the above including running a domU guest,
> but gdm didn't start and I haven't had a chance to work out if that is
> related or not.
>
> Michael Young
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-29 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 5:12 Only 1 CPU was detected Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 6:12 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-28 7:22 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 7:42 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-28 14:45 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 20:03 ` GRUB2 missing multiboot2 patches?Re: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-09-28 20:48 ` Stefan Bader
2017-09-28 23:08 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-29 10:49 ` Michael Young
2017-09-29 13:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2017-09-28 23:06 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 8:38 ` Jan Beulich
2017-09-28 9:32 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 9:39 ` Jan Beulich
2017-09-28 14:36 ` Hongjiang Zhang
2017-09-28 15:07 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170929135451.GC29100@char.us.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=honzhan@microsoft.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
--cc=stefan.bader@canonical.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.