All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>
Cc: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>,
	Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>,
	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:17:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKJRnmPZoDgtk0vSZydQ9MG_NUD6-NGEY9u8Nkc24vDzVZDQXQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:27:09 +0530
Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:29:52 +0530
> > Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> Replace driver usage of mlock with driver private lock to meet the new
> >> model where usage of iio_dev->mlock is being redefined as protecting
> >> operating mode changes(changes between BUFFER* and DIRECT modes).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Himanshi Jain <himshijain.hj@gmail.com>  
> >
> > A well presented patch making a sensible change.  My only thought here
> > is that ultimately we could cover bother the buffer protection and
> > the state protection with a single lock.
> >
> > Hmm. The new lock (as was the old mlock code) is providing protection
> > to ensure we end up with consistent state when changing the
> > sampling frequency between the sampling frequency and the
> > bus clock speed (which has different maximum values depending
> > on the current sampling frequency). In similar cases we have
> > expanded the meaning on the buffer lock to fulfil both roles
> > - that could be done here as well, although you have to be careful
> > about deadlocks.
> >  
> 
> I have understood how to use a single lock for both the purposes as you have
> quoted in Katie's patch too i.e. by making an unlocked version of the function
> ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(). And since the function is not publicly available
> to be used, an unlocked version will not create any issue(which is why I am
> assuming, we are not using nested locks - Please correct me if I am wrong.)
> 
> I will submit a new patch with a single lock.

That's great, but please do it on top of your previous patch as that is now
in a non rebasing tree.

Jonathan

> 
> > On reflection I think this patch is worthwhile applying even
> > if this new lock gets dropped again in some later rework of this
> > driver.
> >
> > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
> > the autobuilders to play with it.
> >  
> 
> Thank you for reviewing and applying the patch and guiding for a better logical
> solution.
> 
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan  
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c | 7 +++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> index ce26abdea..745c5a6 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/meter/ade7753.c
> >> @@ -81,10 +81,12 @@
> >>   * @tx:         transmit buffer
> >>   * @rx:         receive buffer
> >>   * @buf_lock:       mutex to protect tx and rx
> >> + * @lock:    protect sensor data
> >>   **/
> >>  struct ade7753_state {
> >>       struct spi_device   *us;
> >>       struct mutex        buf_lock;
> >> +     struct mutex        lock; /* protect sensor data */
> >>       u8          tx[ADE7753_MAX_TX] ____cacheline_aligned;
> >>       u8          rx[ADE7753_MAX_RX];
> >>  };
> >> @@ -483,7 +485,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>       if (!val)
> >>               return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> -     mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> +     mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       t = 27900 / val;
> >>       if (t > 0)
> >> @@ -504,7 +506,7 @@ static ssize_t ade7753_write_frequency(struct device *dev,
> >>       ret = ade7753_spi_write_reg_16(dev, ADE7753_MODE, reg);
> >>
> >>  out:
> >> -     mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> >> +     mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       return ret ? ret : len;
> >>  }
> >> @@ -580,6 +582,7 @@ static int ade7753_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>       st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >>       st->us = spi;
> >>       mutex_init(&st->buf_lock);
> >> +     mutex_init(&st->lock);
> >>
> >>       indio_dev->name = spi->dev.driver->name;
> >>       indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;  
> >  
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-30 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18  6:59 [PATCH] staging: iio: ade7753: replace mlock with driver private lock Himanshi Jain
2017-09-18 10:06 ` Greg KH
2017-09-24 14:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2017-09-27 14:57   ` Himanshi Jain
2017-09-30 20:17     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-12 13:32 simran singhal
2017-03-13 12:00 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2017-03-13 12:33   ` SIMRAN SINGHAL
2017-03-13 13:34     ` Lars-Peter Clausen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170930211706.790583cd@archlinux \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=himshijain.hj@gmail.com \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.