From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/iova: Don't try to copy anchor nodes Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:47:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20171002134749.GW8398@8bytes.org> References: <3f64827632194aa89821d9183baa08321f00167d.1506941611.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f64827632194aa89821d9183baa08321f00167d.1506941611.git.robin.murphy-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:53:31AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Anchor nodes are not reserved IOVAs in the way that copy_reserved_iova() > cares about - while the failure from reserve_iova() is benign since the > target domain will already have its own anchor, we still don't want to > be triggering spurious warnings. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > --- > drivers/iommu/iova.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Added 'Fixes:'-tag and applied it, thanks Robin. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751412AbdJBNry (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:47:54 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:35840 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750957AbdJBNrx (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:47:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:47:49 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Robin Murphy Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/iova: Don't try to copy anchor nodes Message-ID: <20171002134749.GW8398@8bytes.org> References: <3f64827632194aa89821d9183baa08321f00167d.1506941611.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f64827632194aa89821d9183baa08321f00167d.1506941611.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:53:31AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Anchor nodes are not reserved IOVAs in the way that copy_reserved_iova() > cares about - while the failure from reserve_iova() is benign since the > target domain will already have its own anchor, we still don't want to > be triggering spurious warnings. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > --- > drivers/iommu/iova.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Added 'Fixes:'-tag and applied it, thanks Robin.