Re: [PATCH net] net: br: Fix igmp snooping offload with CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING

[Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>]

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 12:25:08PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:
> 
> >> The vlan will be effective only when vlan_filtering is enabled.
> >> When vlan_filtering is disabled, vlan information is still kept in the
> >> bridge and gets effective later when vlan_filtering becomes enable.
> >
> > O.K, so things are starting to get clearer.
> >
> > So when vlan filtering is disabled, the hardware should just ignore
> > the requests to add the vlan to the hardware?
> >
> > When vlan_filtering is enabled, are all the vlans in the software
> > bridge again offloaded? Or do we need to remember all the vlans which
> > we ignored while vlan filtering was disabled? The average switch has
> > nowhere to store these disabled vlans. It can only store active vlans.
> 
> When vlan_filtering is enabled on the bridge, the bridge code does
> propagates the default_pvid again if I recall correctly.
> 
> In my opinion the hardware mustn't ignore the VLAN requests, because we
> seem to agree that vlan_filtering disabled means that the target ports
> should not care yet about 802.1Q. So having some unused hardware VLAN
> entries and some ports with disabled 802.1Q mode must work together.
> 
> That being said we still have the wrong hardware FDB populated when
> CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING is enabled but not vlan_filtering...

The driver can make sure it's able to handle the configured
`vlan_filtering` state during port enslavement to the bridge and also
forbid it from being toggled once it's enslaved.