From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4928518501358530361=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 09:15:55 -0500
Message-ID: <20171004141555.pu7ibzydvpc52ys3@treble>
In-Reply-To: <20171004092052.ioixdexrsbbwvetr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
List-Id: <oe-lkp.lists.linux.dev>

--===============4928518501358530361==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:20:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yes, I'll do that tomorrow. I was always a bit unhappy about cross-rele=
ase,
> > because it breaks the 'owner task owns the lock' model.
> =

> Still, you can get real deadlocks with completions...
> =

> > Plus I don't think we found that many real bugs with it
> =

> Every bug found is one less bug. It did find a few.

It also found a bunch of unwinder bugs ;-)

-- =

Josh

--===============4928518501358530361==--


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752390AbdJDOP6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:58 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49220 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751176AbdJDOP5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:15:57 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E5D6A128B
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jpoimboe@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 09:15:55 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKP <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
 dereference at 000001f2
Message-ID: <20171004141555.pu7ibzydvpc52ys3@treble>
References: <20171003140634.r2jzujgl62ox4uzh@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFxa_1pCMt-GQmBZUzRbc8_UY9sacmEaCqkDM1_=sq8y_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171003171824.te5cxms2hq634tvi@gmail.com>
 <20171004092052.ioixdexrsbbwvetr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171004092052.ioixdexrsbbwvetr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0.1 (2016-04-01)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Wed, 04 Oct 2017 14:15:57 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 11:20:52AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:18:24PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yes, I'll do that tomorrow. I was always a bit unhappy about cross-release,
> > because it breaks the 'owner task owns the lock' model.
> 
> Still, you can get real deadlocks with completions...
> 
> > Plus I don't think we found that many real bugs with it
> 
> Every bug found is one less bug. It did find a few.

It also found a bunch of unwinder bugs ;-)

-- 
Josh