From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e02FT-0004Pp-O9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 05:15:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e02FN-0007n0-Gx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 05:15:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e02FN-0007mJ-AW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 05:15:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8707C82F for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 09:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:15:09 +0200 From: Igor Mammedov Message-ID: <20171005111509.197fe1f5@nial.brq.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20171005111241.4085e98d@nial.brq.redhat.com> References: <1507049162-27026-1-git-send-email-thuth@redhat.com> <20171003184946.GR17385@localhost.localdomain> <20171005103629.156e9a9b@nial.brq.redhat.com> <5165bbdd-b36a-ab89-e819-c85a788f8415@redhat.com> <20171005111241.4085e98d@nial.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qdev: Check for the availability of a hotplug controller before adding a device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Markus Armbruster , Eduardo Habkost , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:12:41 +0200 Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 11:00:29 +0200 > Thomas Huth wrote: [...] > > Yes, currently we might be able to do it with the typename only ... but > > that seems to be a rather big rework right now, and we might indeed need > > a real device instance later again, so I'd prefer to rather not do that > > rework right now. > it was just remark why it uses 'dev' and a call for an action. forgot the most important word s/a call/NOT a call/ [...]