From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:11:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171005151112.GR3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171005104051.shazuwnqbqjj3be2@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:40:51PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 02:50:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 26a7df4e558c..59688ef3ea23 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -1565,10 +1565,11 @@ static inline int test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > * cond_resched_lock() will drop the spinlock before scheduling,
> > * cond_resched_softirq() will enable bhs before scheduling.
> > */
> > +void rcu_all_qs(void);
> > #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > extern int _cond_resched(void);
> > #else
> > -static inline int _cond_resched(void) { return 0; }
> > +static inline int _cond_resched(void) { rcu_all_qs(); return 0; }
> > #endif
>
> Why does it need to change PREEMPT? the whole cond_resched() thing
> should be a no-op on PREEMPT.
Let's see... Clearly for RCU-preempt, there is no need. And you are
quite right, if rcu_read_lock_bh() or rcu_read_lock_sched() are preventing
a CPU from context switching, invoking cond_resched() on that CPU would
be a bug anyway.
I will drop this hunk, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 21:50 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] RCU CPU stall warning updates for v4.15 Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-05 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-05 15:11 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-10-04 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rcu: Make RCU CPU stall warnings check for irq-disabled CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] rcu: Turn off tracing before dumping trace Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-04 21:50 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] rcu: Suppress RCU CPU stall warnings while " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171005151112.GR3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.