From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com>, Git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Line ending normalization doesn't work as expected
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 23:42:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171005214248.GA31593@tor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqo9pm8e4l.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
> builtin/add.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
> index 5d5773d5cd..264f84dbe7 100644
> --- a/builtin/add.c
> +++ b/builtin/add.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ static const char * const builtin_add_usage[] = {
> };
> static int patch_interactive, add_interactive, edit_interactive;
> static int take_worktree_changes;
> +static int rehash;
>
> struct update_callback_data {
> int flags;
> @@ -121,6 +122,41 @@ int add_files_to_cache(const char *prefix,
> return !!data.add_errors;
> }
>
> +static int rehash_tracked_files(const char *prefix, const struct pathspec *pathspec,
> + int flags)
> +{
> + struct string_list paths = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
> + struct string_list_item *path;
> + int i, retval = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) {
> + struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
> +
> + if (ce_stage(ce))
> + continue; /* do not touch unmerged paths */
> + if (!S_ISREG(ce->ce_mode) && !S_ISLNK(ce->ce_mode))
> + continue; /* do not touch non blobs */
> + if (pathspec && !ce_path_match(ce, pathspec, NULL))
> + continue;
> + string_list_append(&paths, ce->name);
> + }
> +
> + for_each_string_list_item(path, &paths) {
> + /*
> + * Having a blob contaminated with CR will trigger the
> + * safe-crlf kludge, avoidance of which is the primary
> + * thing this helper function exists. Remove it and
> + * then re-add it. Note that this may lose executable
> + * bit on a filesystem that lacks it.
> + */
> + remove_file_from_cache(path->string);
> + add_file_to_cache(path->string, flags);
> + }
> +
> + string_list_clear(&paths, 0);
> + return retval;
> +}
> +
> static char *prune_directory(struct dir_struct *dir, struct pathspec *pathspec, int prefix)
> {
> char *seen;
> @@ -274,6 +310,7 @@ static struct option builtin_add_options[] = {
> OPT_BOOL('e', "edit", &edit_interactive, N_("edit current diff and apply")),
> OPT__FORCE(&ignored_too, N_("allow adding otherwise ignored files")),
> OPT_BOOL('u', "update", &take_worktree_changes, N_("update tracked files")),
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "rehash", &rehash, N_("really update tracked files")),
> OPT_BOOL('N', "intent-to-add", &intent_to_add, N_("record only the fact that the path will be added later")),
> OPT_BOOL('A', "all", &addremove_explicit, N_("add changes from all tracked and untracked files")),
> { OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "ignore-removal", &addremove_explicit,
> @@ -498,7 +535,10 @@ int cmd_add(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>
> plug_bulk_checkin();
>
> - exit_status |= add_files_to_cache(prefix, &pathspec, flags);
> + if (rehash)
> + exit_status |= rehash_tracked_files(prefix, &pathspec, flags);
> + else
> + exit_status |= add_files_to_cache(prefix, &pathspec, flags);
>
> if (add_new_files)
> exit_status |= add_files(&dir, flags);
That looks like a nice one.
Before we put this into stone:
Does it make sense to say "renormalize" instead of "rehash" ?
(That term does exist already for merge.
And rehash is more a technical term, rather then a user-point-of-view explanation)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-05 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 15:00 Line ending normalization doesn't work as expected Robert Dailey
2017-10-03 16:26 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-03 17:23 ` Robert Dailey
2017-10-03 19:19 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-04 2:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-04 16:26 ` Robert Dailey
2017-10-04 16:59 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-04 18:03 ` Robert Dailey
2017-10-05 1:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 1:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-04 21:17 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-05 1:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 3:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-05 21:42 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2017-10-06 0:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-06 17:58 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-16 16:49 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] Introduce git add --renormalize tboegi
2017-10-16 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-30 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 " tboegi
2017-11-07 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 17:26 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-11-08 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-09 18:47 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-11-10 0:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-12 20:08 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-11-16 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 " tboegi
2017-11-17 1:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-17 20:44 ` Eric Sunshine
2017-11-18 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-15 15:24 ` Line ending normalization doesn't work as expected Robert Dailey
2018-02-15 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-15 21:47 ` Robert Dailey
2018-02-16 16:34 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2018-02-16 17:19 ` Robert Dailey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171005214248.GA31593@tor.lan \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rcdailey.lists@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.