From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] m4: Fix libcrypto detection on 32-bit cross build
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:43:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171009154322.GG25633@rei.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171009110101.3329-6-pvorel@suse.cz>
Hi!
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 4eb61e070..89647ba17 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -32,22 +32,23 @@ AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT(/opt/ltp)
>
> AC_CHECK_HEADERS([ \
> ifaddrs.h \
> - libaio.h \
> - mm.h \
> - pthread.h \
> - sys/xattr.h \
> keyutils.h \
> + libaio.h \
> linux/can.h \
> linux/genetlink.h \
> linux/keyctl.h \
> linux/mempolicy.h \
> linux/module.h \
> linux/netlink.h \
> + mm.h \
> + openssl/sha.h \
> + pthread.h \
> sys/acl.h \
> sys/epoll.h \
> - sys/inotify.h \
> sys/fanotify.h \
> + sys/inotify.h \
> sys/prctl.h \
> + sys/xattr.h \
> ])
Can we sort these in a separate patch please?
> # Tools knobs
> diff --git a/m4/ltp-crypto.m4 b/m4/ltp-crypto.m4
> index 3dfc51266..d066ab7e0 100644
> --- a/m4/ltp-crypto.m4
> +++ b/m4/ltp-crypto.m4
> @@ -2,8 +2,10 @@ dnl
> dnl LTP_CHECK_CRYPTO
> dnl ----------------------------
> dnl
> -AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_CRYPTO],
> -[dnl
> -AC_CHECK_HEADERS(openssl/sha.h,[CRYPTO_LIBS=-lcrypto],[CRYPTO_LIBS=])
> -AC_SUBST(CRYPTO_LIBS)
> +AC_DEFUN([LTP_CHECK_CRYPTO], [
> + AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init], [crypto_libs="-lcrypto"])
> + AC_SUBST([CRYPTO_LIBS], [$crypto_libs])
> + if test "x$have_libnuma" != "x"; then
^
Typo?
> + AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBCRYPTO,1,[define whether libcrypto is installed])
> + fi
> ])
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
> index f67eb684b..9f500553c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/src/ima_boot_aggregate.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #include <openssl/sha.h>
> #endif
>
> +#if HAVE_LIBCRYPTO && HAVE_OPENSSL_SHA_H
I wonder if we have to use both here, I guess that it's safer that way.
But it would be cleaner if we changed the m4 checks not to set
HAVE_LIBCRYPTO if either of the AC_CHECK_LIB() or AC_CHECK_HEADER() have
failed.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 11:00 [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Fix 32-bit cross compilation Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 11:00 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] m4: Fix libkeyutils detection on 32-bit cross build Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 15:06 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-10-09 17:04 ` Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 11:00 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] m4: Fix libacl " Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 15:29 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-10-09 11:00 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] m4: Simplify check for linux/can.h header Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 15:37 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-10-09 11:00 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] m4: Simplify check for linux/keyctl.h header Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 11:00 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] m4: Fix libcrypto detection on 32-bit cross build Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 15:43 ` Cyril Hrubis [this message]
2017-10-09 11:01 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] make: Remove workarounds for build without libnuma Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 11:01 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] m4, kernel/lib: Detect libnuma presence in kernel libs Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 15:59 ` Cyril Hrubis
2017-10-09 17:05 ` Petr Vorel
2017-10-09 11:23 ` [LTP] [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Fix 32-bit cross compilation Richard Palethorpe
2017-10-09 12:49 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171009154322.GG25633@rei.lan \
--to=chrubis@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.