From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends() Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:49:58 -0700 Message-ID: <20171010154958.GM3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20171010001951.GA6476@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1507594969-8347-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171010140813.GK3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> <20171010153047.GB3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171010153047.GB3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, dhowells@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, Christoph Lameter List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:30:47AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Please feel free to route with other patches. If this should be > > routed through the percpu tree, please let me know. > > This depends on some other not-yet-finalized patch series, so if you > are OK with it, I will route them with that group of serieses. Sure thing. Thanks for the much needed simplification! -- tejun