All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: weiping zhang <zwp10758@gmail.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Kernel-team@fb.com, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] blockcg: export latency info for each cgroup
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 01:35:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010173551.GB2924@localhost.didichuxing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c8b704eb77e0b8d1792cde7ca1fefcca09b7684f.1507337347.git.shli@fb.com>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:56:01PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> 
> Export the latency info to user. The latency is a good sign to indicate
> if IO is congested or not. User can use the info to make decisions like
> adjust cgroup settings.
Hi Shaohua,
How to check IO congested or not by latency ? Different SSD has
different latency especially when mixed sequence and random IO
operatons.

> 
> Existing io.stat shows accumulated IO bytes and requests, but
> accumulated value for latency doesn't make much sense. This patch
How to understand "accumulated value for latency doesn't make much
sense" could you give an example? I think iostat's r_await and w_await
are nearly equal to rlat_mean and wlat_mean if there is no too much
request starved.
> exports the latency info in a 100ms interval.
> 
> To reduce overhead, latency info of children is propagated to parents
> every 10ms. This means the parents's latency could lost 10ms info of its
> children in 100ms. This should be ok, as we don't need precise latency
> info.
> 
> A micro benchmark running fio test against null_blk in a sixth level
> cgroup doesn't show obvious regression. perf shows a little bit overhead
> in blk_stat_add (~1%) and blkg_lookup (~1%), which is unavoidable right
> now.
> 
> With this patch, the io.stat will show:
> 8:0 rbytes=7282688 wbytes=0 rios=83 wios=0 rlat_mean=2720 rlat_min=183 rlat_max=14880 wlat_mean=0 wlat_min=0 wlat_max=0
> The new fields will display read/write average/minimum/maximum latency
> within 100ms. The latency is us.
> 

Thanks
Weiping

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-10 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-07  0:55 [PATCH V2 0/3] block: export latency info for cgroups Shaohua Li
2017-10-07  0:55 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] blk-stat: delete useless code Shaohua Li
2017-10-10 17:57   ` Omar Sandoval
2017-10-10 18:02   ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-07  0:56 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] block: set request_list for request Shaohua Li
2017-10-10 19:47   ` Jens Axboe
2017-10-07  0:56 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] blockcg: export latency info for each cgroup Shaohua Li
2017-10-10 17:35   ` weiping zhang [this message]
2017-10-10 18:23     ` Shaohua Li
2017-10-11 14:41       ` weiping zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171010173551.GB2924@localhost.didichuxing.com \
    --to=zwp10758@gmail.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.