From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60818 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932114AbdJJR5G (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:57:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:57:14 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Mike Galbraith Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/cpuset/pm: Fix cpuset vs. suspend-resume bugs" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree Message-ID: <20171010175713.GB747@kroah.com> References: <150608112135123@kroah.com> <1507616703.29190.7.camel@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1507616703.29190.7.camel@gmx.de> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:25:03AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 13:52 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to . > > Author: Peter Zijlstra > Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:13:38 +0200 > > sched/cpuset/pm: Fix cpuset vs. suspend-resume bugs > > commit 50e76632339d4655859523a39249dd95ee5e93e7 upstream. > > Cpusets vs. suspend-resume is _completely_ broken. And it got noticed > because it now resulted in non-cpuset usage breaking too. > Thanks for the 2 backports! greg k-h