From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com,
kjlx@templeofstupid.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 4/4] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack message for RIF and VRF overflow
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 18:10:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171011151043.GA13708@splinter> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <72ad213d-7074-e4ca-6799-94da01c38f8e@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 09:07:20AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 10/11/17 8:13 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:41:05AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >> static struct mlxsw_sp_vr *mlxsw_sp_vr_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
> >> - u32 tb_id)
> >> + u32 tb_id,
> >> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >> {
> >> struct mlxsw_sp_vr *vr;
> >> int err;
> >>
> >> vr = mlxsw_sp_vr_find_unused(mlxsw_sp);
> >> - if (!vr)
> >> + if (!vr) {
> >> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "spectrum: Exceeded number of supported VRF");
> >
> > Maybe:
> > "spectrum: Exceeded number of supported VRF devices"
>
> In this context the overflow is virtual routers in spectrum as opposed
> to VRF devices in the kernel context. The existence of the VRF device
> has no bearing until a port is enslaved to it.
>
> How about:
> "spectrum: Exceeded number of supported virtual routers"
OK.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 16:41 [RFC net-next 0/4] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack messages for RIF and VRF overflow David Ahern
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 1/4] net: ipv6: Make inet6addr_validator a blocking notifier David Ahern
2017-10-10 19:32 ` David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:08 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 21:13 ` David Miller
2017-10-11 21:56 ` David Ahern
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 2/4] net: Add extack to validator_info structs used for address notifier David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 3/4] mlxsw: spectrum: router: Add support for address validator notifier David Ahern
2017-10-11 13:54 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 15:19 ` David Ahern
2017-10-10 16:41 ` [RFC net-next 4/4] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add extack message for RIF and VRF overflow David Ahern
2017-10-11 14:13 ` Ido Schimmel
2017-10-11 15:07 ` David Ahern
2017-10-11 15:10 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171011151043.GA13708@splinter \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=kjlx@templeofstupid.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.