diff for duplicates of <20171011214927.GA28741@castle> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 714467d..276e9b3 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ these all are perfect ideas which can be implemented on top of this patchset. > > > processes to child cgroups either purposefully or unpurposefully, and the > > > inability of userspace to effectively control oom victim selection: > > > -> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > > > So, if we'll sum the oom_score of tasks belonging to the root memory cgroup, > > will it fix the problem? @@ -143,3 +143,9 @@ And, tbh, I don't see how oom_priorities will resolve an opposite problem if we'd take the hierarchical approach. Thanks! + +-- +To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in +the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, +see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . +Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 5485a9d..aa43359 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,22 +5,21 @@ "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710101345370.28262@chino.kir.corp.google.com\0" "ref\020171010220417.GA8667@castle\0" "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710111247390.98307@chino.kir.corp.google.com\0" - "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710111247390.98307-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer\0" "Date\0Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:49:27 +0100\0" - "To\0David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" - Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> - Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org> - Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> - Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org - cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>\0" + "Cc\0linux-mm@kvack.org" + Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> + Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> + Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> + Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> + Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> + Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> + kernel-team@fb.com + cgroups@vger.kernel.org + linux-doc@vger.kernel.org + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:21:47PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:\n" @@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ "> > > processes to child cgroups either purposefully or unpurposefully, and the \n" "> > > inability of userspace to effectively control oom victim selection:\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>\n" "> > \n" "> > So, if we'll sum the oom_score of tasks belonging to the root memory cgroup,\n" "> > will it fix the problem?\n" @@ -167,6 +166,12 @@ "And, tbh, I don't see how oom_priorities will resolve an opposite\n" "problem if we'd take the hierarchical approach.\n" "\n" - Thanks! + "Thanks!\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" + "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" + "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" + "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" -c1eb7a8e18d204868c5687433ab9a2865a5953c206e0bab2077348c8a4f8d7eb +b26a069225bdffe4f17f08b993cebab1b8db3fde6262ad6dc8b962d6aa584a25
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 714467d..3506e54 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ these all are perfect ideas which can be implemented on top of this patchset. > > > processes to child cgroups either purposefully or unpurposefully, and the > > > inability of userspace to effectively control oom victim selection: > > > -> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> +> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> > > > > So, if we'll sum the oom_score of tasks belonging to the root memory cgroup, > > will it fix the problem? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 5485a9d..5e81090 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -5,22 +5,21 @@ "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710101345370.28262@chino.kir.corp.google.com\0" "ref\020171010220417.GA8667@castle\0" "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710111247390.98307@chino.kir.corp.google.com\0" - "ref\0alpine.DEB.2.10.1710111247390.98307-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [v11 3/6] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer\0" "Date\0Wed, 11 Oct 2017 22:49:27 +0100\0" - "To\0David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org" - Michal Hocko <mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org> - Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel-1yMVhJb1mP/7nzcFbJAaVXf5DAMn2ifp@public.gmane.org> - Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org> - Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> - kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org - cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>\0" + "Cc\0<linux-mm@kvack.org>" + Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> + Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> + Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> + Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> + Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> + Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> + <kernel-team@fb.com> + <cgroups@vger.kernel.org> + <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org> + " <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:21:47PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:\n" @@ -81,7 +80,7 @@ "> > > processes to child cgroups either purposefully or unpurposefully, and the \n" "> > > inability of userspace to effectively control oom victim selection:\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > > Nacked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>\n" "> > \n" "> > So, if we'll sum the oom_score of tasks belonging to the root memory cgroup,\n" "> > will it fix the problem?\n" @@ -169,4 +168,4 @@ "\n" Thanks! -c1eb7a8e18d204868c5687433ab9a2865a5953c206e0bab2077348c8a4f8d7eb +65d93b9c3bf75cd7f312a12833e0257528e2851babf39b8ee803e977f2992a32
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.