Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] change submodule push test to use proper repository setup

[Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>]

On 10/11, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:39:21AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> wrote:
> > > but in the long run my goal
> > > for submodules is and always was: Make them behave as close to files as
> > > possible. And why should a 'git add submodule' not magically do
> > > everything it can to make submodules just work? I can look into a patch
> > > for that if people agree here...
> > 
> > I'd love to see this implemented. I cc'd Josh (the author of git-series), who
> > may disagree with this, or has some good input how to go forward without
> > breaking git-series.
> 
> git-series doesn't use the git-submodule command at all, nor does it
> construct series trees using git-add or any other git command-line tool;
> it constructs gitlinks directly. Most of the time, it doesn't even make
> sense to `git checkout` a series branch. Modifying commands like git-add
> and similar to automatically manage .gitmodules won't cause any issue at
> all, as long as git itself doesn't start rejecting or complaining about
> repositories that have gitlinks without a .gitmodules file.

That's good to know!  And from what I remember, with the commands we've
begun teaching to understand submodules we have been requiring a
.gitmodules entry for a submodule in order to do the recursion, and a
gitlink without a .gitmodules entry would simply be ignored or skipped.

-- 
Brandon Williams