From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:18:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012181805.GF1165@minitux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500634173-24416-4-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org>
On Fri 21 Jul 03:49 PDT 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
> MSS proc on msm8996 can not access fw loaded region without stage
> second translation of memory pages where mpss image are loaded.
> This patch in order to enable mss boot on msm8996 invoke scm call
> to switch or share ownership between apps and modem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
[..]
> +static int q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(struct q6v5 *qproc, int *current_perm,
> + bool remote_owner, phys_addr_t addr,
> + size_t size)
> +{
> + struct qcom_scm_vmperm next;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!qproc->need_mem_protection)
> + return 0;
> + if (remote_owner && *current_perm == BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_MSS_MSA))
> + return 0;
> + if (!remote_owner && *current_perm == BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS))
> + return 0;
> +
> + next.vmid = remote_owner ? QCOM_SCM_VMID_MSS_MSA : QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS;
> + next.perm = remote_owner ? QCOM_SCM_PERM_RW : QCOM_SCM_PERM_RWX;
> +
> + ret = qcom_scm_assign_mem(addr, ALIGN(size, SZ_4K),
> + *current_perm, &next, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("Failed to assign memory access in range %p to %p to %s ret = %d\n",
> + (void *)addr, (void *)(addr + size),
> + remote_owner ? "mss" : "hlos", ret);
qcom_scm_assign_mem() also prints an error when this happens, there's no
need for that. I'm happy with you dropping the print from
qcom_scm_assign_mem() and keeping this one.
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + *current_perm = ret;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int q6v5_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> struct q6v5 *qproc = rproc->priv;
> @@ -450,6 +484,8 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> unsigned long dma_attrs = DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS;
> dma_addr_t phys;
> + int mdata_perm;
> + int xferop_ret;
> void *ptr;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -461,6 +497,12 @@ static int q6v5_mpss_init_image(struct q6v5 *qproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> memcpy(ptr, fw->data, fw->size);
>
> + /* Hypervisor mapping to access metadata by modem */
> + mdata_perm = BIT(QCOM_SCM_VMID_HLOS);
> + ret = q6v5_xfer_mem_ownership(qproc, &mdata_perm,
> + 1, phys, fw->size);
Please use "true" instead of "1".
> + if (ret)
> + return -EAGAIN;
Please keep a empty line here, to keep the "paragraphs" or "chunks" of
code split up.
> writel(phys, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_PMI_META_DATA_REG);
> writel(RMB_CMD_META_DATA_READY, qproc->rmb_base + RMB_MBA_COMMAND_REG);
>
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-12 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 10:49 [PATCH v7 0/4] Add memory ownership switch support and enable mss rproc on msm8996 Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2017-07-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] firmware: scm: Add new SCM call API for switching memory ownership Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2017-10-12 18:11 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-10-16 13:15 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2017-07-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] remoteproc: qcom: refactor mss fw image loading sequence Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2017-10-12 18:12 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-07-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] remoteproc: qcom: Make secure world call for mem ownership switch Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2017-10-12 18:18 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2017-10-16 13:18 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2017-07-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] remoteproc: qcom: Add support for mss remoteproc on msm8996 Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2017-10-12 18:20 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-10-16 13:19 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2017-10-16 18:58 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-10-19 5:32 ` Sricharan R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171012181805.GF1165@minitux \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akdwived@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.