diff for duplicates of <20171016204734.GO1845@lvm> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index a7bbaf0..1a20ef5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ non-invasive at runtime for normal VMs. > You can create as many VCPUs as you would in a "normal VM". Also, each > VCPU can be ran in a kthread. > -> > Do you support any form of virtual interrupts? How about timers? +> > Do you support any form of virtual interrupts??How about timers? > > No support for virtual interrupts or timers indeed. The EFI Runtime > Services sandboxing wouldn't require that. @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ non-invasive at runtime for normal VMs. > The very idea of Runtime Services sandboxing requires Internal VMs to > have access to some of the physical devices. > -> > How do you debug and trace something like this? Can the VM be +> > How do you debug and trace something like this??Can the VM be > > monitored from userspace? > > There is nothing ready for that. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 9811135..e2663f7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,26 +1,10 @@ "ref\01503649901-5834-1-git-send-email-florent.revest@arm.com\0" "ref\020170831092615.GB13572@cbox\0" "ref\01506460492.5507.58.camel@gmail.com\0" - "From\0Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [RFC 00/11] KVM, EFI, arm64: EFI Runtime Services Sandboxing\0" + "From\0cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)\0" + "Subject\0[RFC 00/11] KVM, EFI, arm64: EFI Runtime Services Sandboxing\0" "Date\0Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:47:34 +0200\0" - "To\0Florent Revest <revestflo@gmail.com>\0" - "Cc\0Florent Revest <florent.revest@arm.com>" - linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - matt@codeblueprint.co.uk - ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org - pbonzini@redhat.com - rkrcmar@redhat.com - christoffer.dall@linaro.org - catalin.marinas@arm.com - will.deacon@arm.com - mark.rutland@arm.com - marc.zyngier@arm.com - linux-efi@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - kvm@vger.kernel.org - kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu - " leif.lindholm@arm.com\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Florent Revest wrote:\n" @@ -54,7 +38,7 @@ "> You can create as many VCPUs as you would in a \"normal VM\". Also, each\n" "> VCPU can be ran in a kthread.\n" "> \n" - "> > Do you support any form of virtual interrupts?\302\240How about timers?\n" + "> > Do you support any form of virtual interrupts??How about timers?\n" "> \n" "> No support for virtual interrupts or timers indeed. The EFI Runtime\n" "> Services sandboxing wouldn't require that.\n" @@ -64,7 +48,7 @@ "> The very idea of Runtime Services sandboxing requires Internal VMs to\n" "> have access to some of the physical devices.\n" "> \n" - "> > How do you debug and trace something like this?\302\240Can the VM be\n" + "> > How do you debug and trace something like this??Can the VM be\n" "> > monitored from userspace?\n" "> \n" "> There is nothing ready for that.\n" @@ -88,4 +72,4 @@ "Thanks,\n" -Christoffer -0603d2d07b189771f3d8859ab123d0f1577ed04529cc673ca826340a4d079ab9 +3d047a9825c8c81879cacb495ecc69a5a08786e8e479665eb526b78e7645eb64
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.