From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:13:49 -0400 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: SPL: FIT: fix DTC warnings on FIT generation In-Reply-To: References: <20171004232439.20817-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <20171016211349.GU12015@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 02:29:14AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Andre, > > > > On 4 October 2017 at 17:24, Andre Przywara wrote: > >> Newer versions of the device tree compiler (rightfully) complain about > >> mismatches between attributed node names (name@) and a missing > >> reg property in that node. > >> Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the > >> bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > >> --- > >> board/sunxi/mksunxi_fit_atf.sh | 16 ++++++++-------- > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > It looks like we have this problem all over the place. The > > documentation in doc/uImage now seems to have this problem too. > > > > I wonder if instead we should add reg / #address-cells / #size-cells properties? > > If the update on dts, might be an another-overhead to maintain u-boot > dts wrt Linux dts sync. Anything that DTC is warning about in a dts that we get from the kernel, should be fixed in the kernel. The kernel dtc is what we're using, and is/will/can also complain about it. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: