From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com,
i.maximets@samsung.com, heetae82.ahn@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 3/6] migration: calculate vCPU blocktime on dst side
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 09:58:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171019085816.GA2281@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38aad850-ad8e-e071-9d6e-2e1f2027e828@samsung.com>
* Alexey Perevalov (a.perevalov@samsung.com) wrote:
> On 10/18/2017 09:59 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Alexey Perevalov (a.perevalov@samsung.com) wrote:
> > > This patch provides blocktime calculation per vCPU,
> > > as a summary and as a overlapped value for all vCPUs.
> > >
> > > This approach was suggested by Peter Xu, as an improvements of
> > > previous approch where QEMU kept tree with faulted page address and cpus bitmask
> > > in it. Now QEMU is keeping array with faulted page address as value and vCPU
> > > as index. It helps to find proper vCPU at UFFD_COPY time. Also it keeps
> > > list for blocktime per vCPU (could be traced with page_fault_addr)
> > >
> > > Blocktime will not calculated if postcopy_blocktime field of
> > > MigrationIncomingState wasn't initialized.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.perevalov@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > migration/postcopy-ram.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > migration/trace-events | 5 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> > > index c18ec5a..2e10870 100644
> > > --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> > > +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
> > > @@ -553,6 +553,141 @@ static int ram_block_enable_notify(const char *block_name, void *host_addr,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > +static int get_mem_fault_cpu_index(uint32_t pid)
> > > +{
> > > + CPUState *cpu_iter;
> > > +
> > > + CPU_FOREACH(cpu_iter) {
> > > + if (cpu_iter->thread_id == pid) {
> > > + trace_get_mem_fault_cpu_index(cpu_iter->cpu_index, pid);
> > > + return cpu_iter->cpu_index;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + trace_get_mem_fault_cpu_index(-1, pid);
> > > + return -1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * This function is being called when pagefault occurs. It
> > > + * tracks down vCPU blocking time.
> > > + *
> > > + * @addr: faulted host virtual address
> > > + * @ptid: faulted process thread id
> > > + * @rb: ramblock appropriate to addr
> > > + */
> > > +static void mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin(uint64_t addr, uint32_t ptid,
> > > + RAMBlock *rb)
> > > +{
> > > + int cpu, already_received;
> > > + MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> > > + PostcopyBlocktimeContext *dc = mis->blocktime_ctx;
> > > + int64_t now_ms;
> > > +
> > > + if (!dc || ptid == 0) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > + cpu = get_mem_fault_cpu_index(ptid);
> > > + if (cpu < 0) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + now_ms = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> > > + if (dc->vcpu_addr[cpu] == 0) {
> > > + atomic_inc(&dc->smp_cpus_down);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->last_begin, now_ms);
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu], now_ms);
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->vcpu_addr[cpu], addr);
> > > +
> > > + /* check it here, not at the begining of the function,
> > > + * due to, check could accur early than bitmap_set in
> > > + * qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl */
> > > + already_received = ramblock_recv_bitmap_test(rb, (void *)addr);
> > > + if (already_received) {
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->vcpu_addr[cpu], 0);
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu], 0);
> > > + atomic_sub(&dc->smp_cpus_down, 1);
> > Minor; but you could use atomic_dec to go with the atomic_inc
> >
> > > + }
> > > + trace_mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin(addr, dc, dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[cpu],
> > > + cpu, already_received);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * This function just provide calculated blocktime per cpu and trace it.
> > > + * Total blocktime is calculated in mark_postcopy_blocktime_end.
> > > + *
> > > + *
> > > + * Assume we have 3 CPU
> > > + *
> > > + * S1 E1 S1 E1
> > > + * -----***********------------xxx***************------------------------> CPU1
> > > + *
> > > + * S2 E2
> > > + * ------------****************xxx---------------------------------------> CPU2
> > > + *
> > > + * S3 E3
> > > + * ------------------------****xxx********-------------------------------> CPU3
> > > + *
> > > + * We have sequence S1,S2,E1,S3,S1,E2,E3,E1
> > > + * S2,E1 - doesn't match condition due to sequence S1,S2,E1 doesn't include CPU3
> > > + * S3,S1,E2 - sequence includes all CPUs, in this case overlap will be S1,E2 -
> > > + * it's a part of total blocktime.
> > > + * S1 - here is last_begin
> > > + * Legend of the picture is following:
> > > + * * - means blocktime per vCPU
> > > + * x - means overlapped blocktime (total blocktime)
> > > + *
> > > + * @addr: host virtual address
> > > + */
> > > +static void mark_postcopy_blocktime_end(uint64_t addr)
> > > +{
> > > + MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> > > + PostcopyBlocktimeContext *dc = mis->blocktime_ctx;
> > > + int i, affected_cpu = 0;
> > > + int64_t now_ms;
> > > + bool vcpu_total_blocktime = false;
> > > +
> > > + if (!dc) {
> > > + return;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + now_ms = qemu_clock_get_ms(QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME);
> > > +
> > > + /* lookup cpu, to clear it,
> > > + * that algorithm looks straighforward, but it's not
> > > + * optimal, more optimal algorithm is keeping tree or hash
> > > + * where key is address value is a list of */
> > > + for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
> > > + uint64_t vcpu_blocktime = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (atomic_fetch_add(&dc->vcpu_addr[i], 0) != addr ||
> > > + atomic_fetch_add(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[i], 0) == 0) {
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > + atomic_xchg__nocheck(&dc->vcpu_addr[i], 0);
> > > + vcpu_blocktime = now_ms -
> > > + atomic_fetch_add(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[i], 0);
> > This is almost there, but you mustn't read vcpu_times twice; the other
> > thread could have gone down the 'received' path during the time between
> > the reads (OK, unlikely but still); so I think you need:
> > read_addr = atomic_fetch_add(&&dc->vcpu_addr[i], 0);
> > read_vcpu_time = atomic_fetch_add(&dc->page_fault_vcpu_time[i], 0);
> I agree with read_vcpu_time, done.
> but not clearing of &dc->vcpu_addr[i], we don't need to clear the copy of
> value, but the original value.
Yes, agreed.
Dave
> > if (read_addr != addr || read_vcpu_time == 0) {
> > continue;
> > }
> > atomic_ vcpu_addr = 0;
> > vcpu_locktime = now_ms - read_vcpu_time;
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > > + affected_cpu += 1;
> > > + /* we need to know is that mark_postcopy_end was due to
> > > + * faulted page, another possible case it's prefetched
> > > + * page and in that case we shouldn't be here */
> > > + if (!vcpu_total_blocktime &&
> > > + atomic_fetch_add(&dc->smp_cpus_down, 0) == smp_cpus) {
> > > + vcpu_total_blocktime = true;
> > > + }
> > > + /* continue cycle, due to one page could affect several vCPUs */
> > > + dc->vcpu_blocktime[i] += vcpu_blocktime;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + atomic_sub(&dc->smp_cpus_down, affected_cpu);
> > > + if (vcpu_total_blocktime) {
> > > + dc->total_blocktime += now_ms - atomic_fetch_add(&dc->last_begin, 0);
> > > + }
> > > + trace_mark_postcopy_blocktime_end(addr, dc, dc->total_blocktime,
> > > + affected_cpu);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Handle faults detected by the USERFAULT markings
> > > */
> > > @@ -630,8 +765,11 @@ static void *postcopy_ram_fault_thread(void *opaque)
> > > rb_offset &= ~(qemu_ram_pagesize(rb) - 1);
> > > trace_postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(msg.arg.pagefault.address,
> > > qemu_ram_get_idstr(rb),
> > > - rb_offset);
> > > + rb_offset,
> > > + msg.arg.pagefault.feat.ptid);
> > > + mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin((uintptr_t)(msg.arg.pagefault.address),
> > > + msg.arg.pagefault.feat.ptid, rb);
> > > /*
> > > * Send the request to the source - we want to request one
> > > * of our host page sizes (which is >= TPS)
> > > @@ -721,6 +859,8 @@ static int qemu_ufd_copy_ioctl(int userfault_fd, void *host_addr,
> > > if (!ret) {
> > > ramblock_recv_bitmap_set_range(rb, host_addr,
> > > pagesize / qemu_target_page_size());
> > > + mark_postcopy_blocktime_end((uint64_t)(uintptr_t)host_addr);
> > > +
> > > }
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/migration/trace-events b/migration/trace-events
> > > index 6f29fcc..b0c8708 100644
> > > --- a/migration/trace-events
> > > +++ b/migration/trace-events
> > > @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ process_incoming_migration_co_end(int ret, int ps) "ret=%d postcopy-state=%d"
> > > process_incoming_migration_co_postcopy_end_main(void) ""
> > > migration_set_incoming_channel(void *ioc, const char *ioctype) "ioc=%p ioctype=%s"
> > > migration_set_outgoing_channel(void *ioc, const char *ioctype, const char *hostname) "ioc=%p ioctype=%s hostname=%s"
> > > +mark_postcopy_blocktime_begin(uint64_t addr, void *dd, int64_t time, int cpu, int received) "addr: 0x%" PRIx64 ", dd: %p, time: %" PRId64 ", cpu: %d, already_received: %d"
> > > +mark_postcopy_blocktime_end(uint64_t addr, void *dd, int64_t time, int affected_cpu) "addr: 0x%" PRIx64 ", dd: %p, time: %" PRId64 ", affected_cpu: %d"
> > > # migration/rdma.c
> > > qemu_rdma_accept_incoming_migration(void) ""
> > > @@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ postcopy_ram_enable_notify(void) ""
> > > postcopy_ram_fault_thread_entry(void) ""
> > > postcopy_ram_fault_thread_exit(void) ""
> > > postcopy_ram_fault_thread_quit(void) ""
> > > -postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(uint64_t hostaddr, const char *ramblock, size_t offset) "Request for HVA=0x%" PRIx64 " rb=%s offset=0x%zx"
> > > +postcopy_ram_fault_thread_request(uint64_t hostaddr, const char *ramblock, size_t offset, uint32_t pid) "Request for HVA=%" PRIx64 " rb=%s offset=%zx pid=%u"
> > > postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_closeuf(void) ""
> > > postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_entry(void) ""
> > > postcopy_ram_incoming_cleanup_exit(void) ""
> > > @@ -200,6 +202,7 @@ save_xbzrle_page_skipping(void) ""
> > > save_xbzrle_page_overflow(void) ""
> > > ram_save_iterate_big_wait(uint64_t milliconds, int iterations) "big wait: %" PRIu64 " milliseconds, %d iterations"
> > > ram_load_complete(int ret, uint64_t seq_iter) "exit_code %d seq iteration %" PRIu64
> > > +get_mem_fault_cpu_index(int cpu, uint32_t pid) "cpu: %d, pid: %u"
> > > # migration/exec.c
> > > migration_exec_outgoing(const char *cmd) "cmd=%s"
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > --
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexey Perevalov
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20171005111622eucas1p2093fedb3a69ca522d6b8260377b75419@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 0/6] calculate blocktime for postcopy live migration Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 1/6] migration: introduce postcopy-blocktime capability Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 2/6] migration: add postcopy blocktime ctx into MigrationIncomingState Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-18 11:21 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 3/6] migration: calculate vCPU blocktime on dst side Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-18 18:59 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-10-19 8:48 ` Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-19 8:58 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 4/6] migration: postcopy_blocktime documentation Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 5/6] migration: add blocktime calculation into postcopy-test Alexey Perevalov
2017-10-18 19:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2017-10-05 11:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 6/6] migration: add postcopy total blocktime into query-migrate Alexey Perevalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171019085816.GA2281@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=a.perevalov@samsung.com \
--cc=heetae82.ahn@samsung.com \
--cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.