From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: mark expected switch fall-throughs Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 09:29:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20171021162953.GT1302522@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20171012191916.GA2974@embeddedor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f195.google.com ([209.85.220.195]:46888 "EHLO mail-qk0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932173AbdJUQ34 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:29:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171012191916.GA2974@embeddedor.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Hans de Goede , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:19:16PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > In cases where a "drop through" comment was already in place, I replaced > it with a proper "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting > to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Applied to libata/for-4.15. Thanks. -- tejun