[PATCH v2] net: smc_close: mark expected switch fall-through

["Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>]

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 Move the "fall through" comment on its own line
 above the rest of the sentence.

 net/smc/smc_close.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index f0d16fb..a6c6559 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -360,7 +360,8 @@ static void smc_close_passive_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT1:
 		if (rxflags->peer_done_writing)
 			sk->sk_state = SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2;
-		/* fall through to check for closing */
+		/* fall through */
+		/* to check for closing */
 	case SMC_PEERCLOSEWAIT2:
 	case SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT:
 		if (!smc_cdc_rxed_any_close(&smc->conn))
-- 
2.7.4