From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH -stable] ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:01:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171024120135.GM3323@secunet.com> (raw)
Please queue up the following patch for -stable.
It fixes a security bug and should be applied to
all maintained stable versions.
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 20:51:10 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash
[ Upstream commit 1137b5e2529a8f5ca8ee709288ecba3e68044df2 ]
An independent security researcher, Mohamed Ghannam, has reported
this vulnerability to Beyond Security's SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure
program.
The xfrm_dump_policy_done function expects xfrm_dump_policy to
have been called at least once or it will crash. This can be
triggered if a dump fails because the target socket's receive
buffer is full.
This patch fixes it by using the cb->start mechanism to ensure that
the initialisation is always done regardless of the buffer situation.
Fixes: 12a169e7d8f4 ("ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index b997f13..e44a0fe 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1693,32 +1693,34 @@ static int dump_one_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, int count, void *ptr
static int xfrm_dump_policy_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
- struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
+ struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
struct net *net = sock_net(cb->skb->sk);
xfrm_policy_walk_done(walk, net);
return 0;
}
+static int xfrm_dump_policy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
+{
+ struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*walk) > sizeof(cb->args));
+
+ xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int xfrm_dump_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
{
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
- struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
+ struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xfrm_policy_walk) >
- sizeof(cb->args) - sizeof(cb->args[0]));
-
info.in_skb = cb->skb;
info.out_skb = skb;
info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
- if (!cb->args[0]) {
- cb->args[0] = 1;
- xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
- }
-
(void) xfrm_policy_walk(net, walk, dump_one_policy, &info);
return skb->len;
@@ -2474,6 +2476,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy xfrma_spd_policy[XFRMA_SPD_MAX+1] = {
static const struct xfrm_link {
int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **);
+ int (*start)(struct netlink_callback *);
int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *);
int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *);
const struct nla_policy *nla_pol;
@@ -2487,6 +2490,7 @@ static const struct xfrm_link {
[XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy },
[XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy,
+ .start = xfrm_dump_policy_start,
.dump = xfrm_dump_policy,
.done = xfrm_dump_policy_done },
[XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_alloc_userspi },
@@ -2539,6 +2543,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
{
struct netlink_dump_control c = {
+ .start = link->start,
.dump = link->dump,
.done = link->done,
};
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 12:01 Steffen Klassert [this message]
2017-10-24 12:12 ` [PATCH -stable] ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash Greg KH
2017-10-24 12:14 ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-30 9:45 ` Greg KH
2017-10-30 9:53 ` Greg KH
2017-10-30 10:09 ` Steffen Klassert
2017-10-24 12:16 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171024120135.GM3323@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.