From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751743AbdJXQcB (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:32:01 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:56899 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751514AbdJXQb6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:31:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 18:31:55 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Egil Hjelmeland Cc: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: dsa: lan9303: Move struct lan9303 to include/linux/lan9303.h Message-ID: <20171024163155.GB12347@lunn.ch> References: <20171024093515.6749-1-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no> <20171024093515.6749-2-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171024093515.6749-2-privat@egil-hjelmeland.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35:14AM +0200, Egil Hjelmeland wrote: > The next patch require net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c to access struct lan9303. > Therefore move struct lan9303 definitions from drivers/net/dsa/lan9303.h > to new file include/linux/lan9303.h. > > Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland O.K, so not too bad. I am now however wondering if include/linux/dsa/lan9303.h would be better? Anyway, Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew