From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: Consequences of CRLF in index?
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:22:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026192201.GB27760@tor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30ED36AB-FAB1-4635-94AF-FCEC6F02CE01@gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:01:25PM +0200, Lars Schneider wrote:
>
> > On 26 Oct 2017, at 09:09, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> wrote:
> >
> > Am 25.10.2017 um 14:19 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
> >> I envy you for the blessing of such a clean C++ source that you do not
> >> have any, say, Unix shell script in it. Try this, and weep:
> >> $ printf 'echo \\\r\n\t123\r\n' >a1
> >> $ sh a1
> >> a1: 2: a1: 123: not found
> >
> > I was bitten by that, too. For this reason, I ensure that shell scripts and Makefiles begin their life on Linux. Fortunately, modern editors on Windows, includ^Wand vi, do not force CRLF line breaks, and such files can be edited on Windows, too.
>
> Wouldn't this kind of .gitattributes setup solve the problem?
>
> * -text
> *.sh text eol=lf
>
Yes, exactly. and for the snake-lovers:
*.py text eol=lf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-26 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 17:48 Consequences of CRLF in index? Lars Schneider
2017-10-24 18:14 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-24 19:02 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-25 12:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-10-25 1:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-25 4:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-25 16:44 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-26 5:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-27 6:13 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2017-10-27 17:06 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-27 17:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Stefan Beller
2017-10-27 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] xdiff/xdiff.h: remove unused flags Stefan Beller
2017-10-27 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] xdiff/xdiffi.c: remove unneeded function declarations Stefan Beller
2017-10-30 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Re* Consequences of CRLF in index? Stefan Beller
2017-10-31 2:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-31 16:41 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-31 17:01 ` Jeff King
2017-11-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Teach "diff" to ignore only CR at EOL Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] xdiff: reassign xpparm_t.flags bits Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 12:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-07 15:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 6:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] diff: --ignore-cr-at-eol Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 13:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-08 0:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-08 0:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-15 4:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 12:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Teach "diff" to ignore only CR at EOL Johannes Schindelin
2017-11-07 15:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-11-07 17:42 ` Stefan Beller
2017-10-25 17:04 ` Consequences of CRLF in index? Lars Schneider
2017-10-25 17:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-26 11:06 ` Lars Schneider
2017-10-26 19:15 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2017-10-24 21:04 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-10-25 12:19 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-10-26 7:09 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-10-26 11:01 ` Lars Schneider
2017-10-26 19:22 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2017-10-26 20:20 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-10-26 20:30 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-10-26 20:51 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-10-26 22:27 ` Ross Kabus
2017-10-27 1:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-27 15:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171026192201.GB27760@tor.lan \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.