From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alice Michael Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH S81-V3 4/9] i40evf: release bit locks in reverse order In-Reply-To: <20171027150656.68250-1-alice.michael@intel.com> References: <20171027150656.68250-1-alice.michael@intel.com> Message-ID: <20171027150656.68250-4-alice.michael@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: From: Jacob Keller Although not strictly necessary, it is customary to reverse the order in which we release locks that we acquire. This helps preserve lock ordering during future refactors, which can help avoid potential deadlock situations. Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c index 2b135dc..9a945ff 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c @@ -1960,8 +1960,8 @@ static void i40evf_reset_task(struct work_struct *work) adapter->aq_required |= I40EVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER; adapter->aq_required |= I40EVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_VLAN_FILTER; - clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CRITICAL_TASK, &adapter->crit_section); clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CLIENT_TASK, &adapter->crit_section); + clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CRITICAL_TASK, &adapter->crit_section); i40evf_misc_irq_enable(adapter); mod_timer(&adapter->watchdog_timer, jiffies + 2); -- 2.9.5