From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: syzbot
<bot+f67ad450a4bd1e42a7bd09f592904b15be39db7a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in perf_event_ctx_lock_nested
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:11:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171027151137.GC3165@worktop.lehotels.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001a11448f6c0346ec055c831a71@google.com>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 01:30:30AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 4.13.0-next-20170911+ #19 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor2/12380 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&ctx->mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8180923c>]
> perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x1dc/0x3c0 kernel/events/core.c:1210
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81ac0fa6>] pipe_lock_nested
> fs/pipe.c:66 [inline]
> (&pipe->mutex/1){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81ac0fa6>] pipe_lock+0x56/0x70
> fs/pipe.c:74
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
ARRGH!!
that translates like the below, which is an absolute maze and requires
at least 5 concurrent callstacks, possibly more.
We already had a lot of fun with hotplug-perf-ftrace, but the below
contains more. Let me try and page that previous crap back.
perf_ioctl()
#0 perf_event_ctx_lock() [ctx->mutex]
perf_event_set_filter
#1 ftrace_profile_set_filter [event_mutex]
sys_perf_event_open
...
perf_trace_init
#1 mutex_lock [event_mutex]
trace_event_reg
tracepoint_probe_register
#2 mutex_lock() [tracepoints_mutex]
tracepoint_add_func()
#3 static_key_slow_inc() [cpuhotplug_lock]
cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls
#3 cpus_read_lock [cpuhotplug_lock]
__cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked
#4 mutex_lock [cpuhp_state_mutex]
cpuhp_issue_call
#5 cpuhp_invoke_ap_callback() [cpuhp_state]
#5 cpuhp_invoke_callback [cpuhp_state]
...
devtmpfs_create_node
#6 wait_for_completion() [&req.done]
devtmpfsd
handle_create
#7 filename_create [sb_writers]
#6 complete [&req.done]
do_splice
#7 file_start_write() [sb_writers]
do_splice_from
iter_file_splice_write
#8 pipe_lock [pipe->mutex]
do_splice
#8 pipe_lock [pipe->mutex]
do_splice_to
...
#0 perf_read() [ctx->mutex]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-27 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <001a11448f6c0346ec055c831a71@google.com>
2017-10-27 8:31 ` possible deadlock in perf_event_ctx_lock_nested Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-27 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-10-27 15:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 15:04 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-02-14 14:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171027151137.GC3165@worktop.lehotels.local \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bot+f67ad450a4bd1e42a7bd09f592904b15be39db7a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.