From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:04:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171030180446.GY3659@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171024093204.GA47418@beast>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 02:32:04AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
One question below.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 4 ++--
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 9 +++++----
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> index e1d3fa534ac0..b6fbbeb5a7da 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ static void rcu_torture_timer_cb(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> * counter in the element should never be greater than 1, otherwise, the
> * RCU implementation is broken.
> */
> -static void rcu_torture_timer(unsigned long unused)
> +static void rcu_torture_timer(struct timer_list *unused)
> {
> int idx;
> unsigned long started;
> @@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ rcu_torture_reader(void *arg)
> VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("rcu_torture_reader task started");
> set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE);
> if (irqreader && cur_ops->irq_capable)
> - setup_timer_on_stack(&t, rcu_torture_timer, 0);
> + timer_setup_on_stack(&t, rcu_torture_timer, 0);
>
> do {
> if (irqreader && cur_ops->irq_capable) {
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 8a5a3f9b1250..5fb7beee76aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2265,9 +2265,11 @@ static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> }
>
> /* Do a deferred wakeup of rcu_nocb_kthread() from a timer handler. */
> -static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer(unsigned long x)
> +static void do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer(struct timer_list *t)
> {
> - do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common((struct rcu_data *)x);
> + struct rcu_data *x = from_timer(x, t, nocb_timer);
As long as we are creating a real typed variable for this could we
please call it "rdp" in order to follow the usual RCU conventions?
struct rcu_data *rdp = from_timer(rdp, t, nocb_timer);
> +
> + do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common(x);
And of course here:
do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common(rdp);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2331,8 +2333,7 @@ static void __init rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> init_swait_queue_head(&rdp->nocb_wq);
> rdp->nocb_follower_tail = &rdp->nocb_follower_head;
> raw_spin_lock_init(&rdp->nocb_lock);
> - setup_timer(&rdp->nocb_timer, do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer,
> - (unsigned long)rdp);
> + timer_setup(&rdp->nocb_timer, do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer, 0);
Shouldn't this instead be something like this, give or take casts?
timer_setup(&rdp->nocb_timer, do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_timer, rdp);
Otherwise, I don't see how do_nocb_deferred_wakeup_common() avoids a
NULL-pointer dereference.
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 9:32 [PATCH] rcu: Convert timers to use timer_setup() Kees Cook
2017-10-25 14:17 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-30 18:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-30 18:04 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-10-30 21:13 ` Kees Cook
2017-10-30 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171030180446.GY3659@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.