From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel crash in free_pipe_info()
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:00:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031050000.GK21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxwY6aLaKEifHwh6UZJ+6VR_XBA8B1w4SbnA+F8Cu2v6g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 08:06:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We do that "free_pipe_info(inode->i_pipe);", but we never actually
> clear inode->i_pipe, so now we have an inode that looks like a pipe
> inode, and has a stale pointer to a pipe_inode_info.
>
> It all looks technically correct. It's fine to use put_filp(), because
> the file pointer has never really been used. And the inode should
> never get re-used anyway without going through the whole reinit in
> inode_init_always().
>
> So I don't see anything *wrong*, but I see a lot that is just unusual,
FWIW, it's really brittle - consider
if ((mode & (FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE)) == FMODE_READ)
i_readcount_inc(path->dentry->d_inode);
in alloc_file(). It's not the source of trouble in this case, but only
because it's the second call that gets FMODE_READ; reorder them in
create_pipe_files() and you've got a bug.
I considered using fput() there, but that would've required manually
decrementing pipe->files first, which made it rather unappealing...
I don't see anything relevant there, but that's not saying much - flu
and debugging do not mix well, and lack of sleep also doesn't help ;-/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-31 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-30 20:58 Kernel crash in free_pipe_info() Cong Wang
2017-10-30 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-30 22:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-31 1:19 ` Cong Wang
2017-10-31 2:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-31 3:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-31 5:00 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-10-31 4:44 ` Al Viro
2017-10-31 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-11-01 3:19 ` Cong Wang
2017-11-10 6:07 ` Simon Brewer
2017-11-10 19:16 ` Cong Wang
2017-11-10 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-31 1:28 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171031050000.GK21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.