All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2017-10-30
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:40:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101144041.05df6b0b@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHXCMMKsPg-DZW385VWMgUQmtngB_L9ALJqJiuZPj2Oz9g0uJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:17:33 +0100, Samuel Martin wrote:

> >>     mips64el |                opencv-2.4.13.3 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b27d324331f6e351e95dd4742f4d0a50af60c590 |
> >>     mips64el |                opencv-2.4.13.3 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/44ed0be0bd94028b7b37e7bf21233adc1753d94b |  
> >
> > CMake Error at cmake/OpenCVCompilerOptions.cmake:21 (else):
> >   A duplicate ELSE command was found inside an IF block.
> > Call Stack (most recent call first):
> >   CMakeLists.txt:437 (include)
> >
> > Should be easy to fix. Samuel, do you think you will find some time to
> > have a look at this?  
> 
> I was about to check on these failures when the abo were off for
> maintainance yesterday.
> Hopefully I should have time to look into this by the end of the week.

Thanks!

> >>         bfin |                 openobex-1.7.2 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/78e033fe9f43845581a5d87b21a8451f67520e44 |  
> >
> > /usr/lfs/v0/rc-buildroot-test/scripts/instance-2/output/build/openobex-1.7.2/lib/obex_transport_sock.c:(.text+0x5f6): undefined reference to `accept4'
> >
> > Not sure what's going on. accept4() not wired in Linux or uClibc for
> > Blackfin? Something else? Waldemar, could you have a look?
> 
> I have a pending patch for openobex,.
> It seems accept4 is not available in uclibc for blackfin architecture [1].
> Grepping at the git log, similar issues were fixed by disabling the
> package on blackfin target.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> [1] https://cgit.openadk.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/tree/libc/sysdeps/linux/common/bits/kernel-features.h#n452

This is weird, because even major architectures like ARM are not listed
as part of the architectures that have accept4. But I don't even see
this __ASSUME_ACCEPT4 used anywhere.

Waldmear ?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31  7:00 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Build results for 2017-10-30 Thomas Petazzoni
2017-10-31 22:05 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01  2:37   ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-01  9:45     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:01       ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-01 10:24         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:31           ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-02  2:31           ` Waldemar Brodkorb
2017-11-02  8:06             ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 13:24       ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-01 13:37         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-01 10:17   ` Samuel Martin
2017-11-01 13:40     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-11-01 18:03   ` Baruch Siach
2017-11-02 10:54     ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-03 22:31       ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-02 10:46   ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-02 17:43   ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 18:08     ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 20:04     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-02 20:55       ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-02 22:21   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-02 22:30     ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-03 11:17     ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 13:38       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 13:46         ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 13:52           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 14:18             ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 14:28               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-03 14:35                 ` Angelo Compagnucci
2017-11-03 14:41                   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-04 22:18     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-11-04 22:20       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-04 22:36         ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-05 14:40           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-05 19:36             ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-11-05 22:35               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-11-09 20:58       ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-02 22:22   ` Alexey Brodkin
2017-11-08 12:49   ` Johan Oudinet
2017-11-08 16:16     ` Matthew Weber
2017-11-08 17:33       ` Yann E. MORIN
2017-11-08 19:35         ` Matthew Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101144041.05df6b0b@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.