From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 03 Nov 2017 06:14:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48165 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23990409AbdKCFOsIcaCC (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:48 +0100 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 5082B68B01; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5Y2O5omN?= Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Christoph Hellwig , Robin Murphy , Andrew Morton , Fuxin Zhang , linux-kernel , Ralf Baechle , JamesHogan , linux-mips , "James E . J .Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi , stable , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Pawel Osciak , Kyungmin Park , Michael Chan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ivan Mikhaylov , Tariq Toukan , Andy Gross , "Mark A . Greer" , RobertBaldyga Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() Message-ID: <20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de> References: <1508742767-28366-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <0f34e021-a559-3e3c-4586-48450e87d5c8@samsung.com> <7ac87ae6-32e5-bd14-32a1-abdcf8aa8221@samsung.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 60700 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@lst.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well. But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be merged to stable. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/4] dma-mapping: Rework dma_get_cache_alignment() Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 06:14:45 +0100 Message-ID: <20171103051445.GA14933@lst.de> References: <1508742767-28366-1-git-send-email-chenhc@lemote.com> <0f34e021-a559-3e3c-4586-48450e87d5c8@samsung.com> <7ac87ae6-32e5-bd14-32a1-abdcf8aa8221@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?6ZmI5Y2O5omN?= Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Christoph Hellwig , Robin Murphy , Andrew Morton , Fuxin Zhang , linux-kernel , Ralf Baechle , JamesHogan , linux-mips , "James E . J .Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" , linux-scsi , stable , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Pawel Osciak , Kyungmin Park , Michael Chan , Benjamin Herrenschmidt List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org I can queue 1 up in the dma-mapping tree, and if I get reviews for the mips and scsi bits I'd be happy to queue those up as well. But I think you'd be better off moving patches 3 and 4 to the front without the dma_get_cache_alignment prototype change so that they can be merged to stable.