From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] lib/dlock-list: Scale dlock_lists_empty()
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 07:22:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103142254.d55bu2n44xe4aruf@linux-n805> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103133420.pngmrsfmtimataz4@linux-n805>
Instead of the current O(N) implementation, at the cost
of adding an atomic counter, we can convert the call to
an atomic_read(). The counter only serves for accounting
empty to non-empty transitions, and vice versa; therefore
only modified twice for each of the lists during the
lifetime of the dlock (while used).
In addition, to be able to unaccount a list_del(), we
add a dlist pointer to each head, thus minimizing the
overall memory footprint.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
Changes from v2: Removed some bogus lines and an overoptimistic
changelog.
include/linux/dlock-list.h | 2 ++
lib/dlock-list.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dlock-list.h b/include/linux/dlock-list.h
index c00c7f92ada4..d176a2d00cd1 100644
--- a/include/linux/dlock-list.h
+++ b/include/linux/dlock-list.h
@@ -32,10 +32,12 @@
struct dlock_list_head {
struct list_head list;
spinlock_t lock;
+ struct dlock_list_heads *dlist;
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
struct dlock_list_heads {
struct dlock_list_head *heads;
+ atomic_t waiters;
};
/*
diff --git a/lib/dlock-list.c b/lib/dlock-list.c
index a4ddecc01b12..5814e42c5b81 100644
--- a/lib/dlock-list.c
+++ b/lib/dlock-list.c
@@ -122,8 +122,11 @@ int __alloc_dlock_list_heads(struct dlock_list_heads *dlist,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head->list);
head->lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(&head->lock);
+ head->dlist = dlist;
lockdep_set_class(&head->lock, key);
}
+
+ atomic_set(&dlist->waiters, 0);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__alloc_dlock_list_heads);
@@ -139,29 +142,36 @@ void free_dlock_list_heads(struct dlock_list_heads *dlist)
{
kfree(dlist->heads);
dlist->heads = NULL;
+ atomic_set(&dlist->waiters, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_dlock_list_heads);
/**
* dlock_lists_empty - Check if all the dlock lists are empty
* @dlist: Pointer to the dlock_list_heads structure
- * Return: true if list is empty, false otherwise.
*
- * This can be a pretty expensive function call. If this function is required
- * in a performance critical path, we may have to maintain a global count
- * of the list entries in the global dlock_list_heads structure instead.
+ * Return: true if all dlock lists are empty, false otherwise.
*/
bool dlock_lists_empty(struct dlock_list_heads *dlist)
{
- int idx;
-
/* Shouldn't be called before nr_dlock_lists is initialized */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!nr_dlock_lists);
- for (idx = 0; idx < nr_dlock_lists; idx++)
- if (!list_empty(&dlist->heads[idx].list))
- return false;
- return true;
+ /*
+ * Serialize dlist->waiters such that a 0->1 transition is not missed
+ * by another thread checking if any of the dlock lists are used.
+ *
+ * CPU0 CPU1
+ * dlock_list_add() dlock_lists_empty()
+ * [S] atomic_inc(waiters);
+ * smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ * smp_mb__before_atomic();
+ * [L] atomic_read(waiters)
+ * list_add()
+ *
+ */
+ smp_mb__before_atomic();
+ return !atomic_read(&dlist->waiters);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dlock_lists_empty);
@@ -179,6 +189,16 @@ void dlock_lists_add(struct dlock_list_node *node,
struct dlock_list_head *head = &dlist->heads[this_cpu_read(cpu2idx)];
/*
+ * Bump the waiters counter _before_ taking the head->lock
+ * such that we don't miss a thread adding itself to a list
+ * while spinning for the lock.
+ */
+ if (list_empty_careful(&head->list)) {
+ atomic_inc(&dlist->waiters);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ }
+
+ /*
* There is no need to disable preemption
*/
spin_lock(&head->lock);
@@ -212,6 +232,18 @@ void dlock_lists_del(struct dlock_list_node *node)
spin_lock(&head->lock);
if (likely(head == node->head)) {
list_del_init(&node->list);
+ /*
+ * We still hold the head->lock, a normal list_empty()
+ * check will do.
+ */
+ if (list_empty(&head->list)) {
+ struct dlock_list_heads *dlist;
+ dlist = node->head->dlist;
+
+ atomic_dec(&dlist->waiters);
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
+ }
+
node->head = NULL;
retry = false;
} else {
--
2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 18:50 [PATCH v8 0/6] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list Waiman Long
2017-10-31 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists Waiman Long
2017-10-31 21:37 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-01 18:44 ` Waiman Long
2017-11-02 17:04 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-02 17:30 ` Waiman Long
2017-11-03 13:34 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-03 14:22 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2017-11-03 16:33 ` [PATCH v3] lib/dlock-list: Scale dlock_lists_empty() Waiman Long
2017-11-06 18:47 ` [PATCH v4] " Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-06 19:06 ` Waiman Long
2017-11-07 11:59 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-07 17:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-11-07 18:57 ` Waiman Long
2017-11-07 19:36 ` James Bottomley
2017-11-08 2:08 ` Boqun Feng
2017-11-09 17:24 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-09 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists Davidlohr Bueso
2017-10-31 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/6] vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() variants Waiman Long
2017-10-31 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/6] vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list Waiman Long
2017-10-31 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 4/6] lib/dlock-list: Make sibling CPUs share the same linked list Waiman Long
2017-11-01 8:38 ` Jan Kara
2017-10-31 18:50 ` [PATCH v8 5/6] lib/dlock-list: Enable faster lookup with hashing Waiman Long
2017-11-01 8:40 ` Jan Kara
2017-11-01 13:16 ` Waiman Long
2017-10-31 18:51 ` [PATCH v8 6/6] lib/dlock-list: Add an IRQ-safe mode to be used in interrupt handler Waiman Long
2017-10-31 21:29 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-29 15:26 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list Davidlohr Bueso
2017-11-29 15:31 ` Waiman Long
2018-02-26 2:47 ` Dave Chinner
2018-02-26 4:05 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103142254.d55bu2n44xe4aruf@linux-n805 \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.