From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 21:32:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171103152636.9967-3-pablo@netfilter.org>
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> +static int __init nf_flow_offload_module_init(void)
> +{
> + struct rhashtable_params params = flow_offload_rhash_params;
> + struct nf_hook_ops flow_offload_hook = {
> + .hook = nf_flow_offload_hook,
> + .pf = NFPROTO_NETDEV,
> + .hooknum = NF_NETDEV_INGRESS,
> + .priority = -100,
Magic number. Should this be documented in nft?
Alternatively we could reject NETDEV_INGRESS base chains from
userspace if prio < 0 to prevent userspace rules from messing
with this flow offlaod infrastructure.
I guess the rationale of using auto-builtin hook is to avoid
forcing users to configure this with nftables rules?
> + rtnl_lock();
> + for_each_netdev(&init_net, dev) {
> + entry = kmalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!entry) {
> + rtnl_unlock();
> + return -ENOMEM;
This would need error unwinding (Unregistering the already-registered
hooks).
> + err = nf_register_net_hook(&init_net, &entry->ops);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
And here as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-03 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-03 15:26 [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 1/5] netfilter: nf_conntrack: move nf_ct_netns_{get,put}() to core Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 15:30 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 2/5] netfilter: add software flow offload infrastructure Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:32 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 3/5] netfilter: nf_flow_offload: integration with conntrack Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 19:49 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 4/5] netfilter: nf_tables: flow offload expression Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-04 1:19 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-03 15:26 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 5/5] netfilter: nft_flow_offload: add ndo hooks for hardware offload Pablo Neira Ayuso
2017-11-03 20:56 ` Florian Westphal
2017-11-11 12:49 ` Felix Fietkau
2017-11-04 4:49 ` [PATCH RFC,WIP 0/5] Flow offload infrastructure Florian Fainelli
2017-11-14 0:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171103203249.GA25602@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.