All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: serial: Add .pre_probe() function to to wait for previous transmission end
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 23:16:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171105231658.1a8bb295@jawa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPnjgZ2uXcL8Whq4Hf=yU4VbyetEveWR8Z9FjZy=DNby0W+-Lw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Simon,

> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On 4 November 2017 at 15:42, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de> wrote:
> >
> > Dear All,
> >  
> > > Hi Philipp,
> > >  
> > > > Hi Lukasz,
> > > >  
> > > > > On 27 Oct 2017, at 00:51, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > > > > wrote:  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >>> On 27 Oct 2017, at 00:13, Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> It may happen that the serial IP block is performing some
> > > > >>> ongoing transmission (started at e.g. board_init()) when the
> > > > >>> serial "probe" is called.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As a result the serial port IP block is reset, so
> > > > >>> transmitted data is corrupted:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   I2C:   ready
> > > > >>>   DRAM:  1 GiB
> > > > >>>   jSS('HH��SL_SDHC: 04 rev 0x0
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> This patch prevents from this situation, by defining
> > > > >>> pre_probe() callback in which we wait till the TX buffer is
> > > > >>> empty (from previous transmission):
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>   I2C:   ready
> > > > >>>   DRAM:  1 GiB
> > > > >>>   ID:    unit type 0x4 rev 0x0
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> All defined ->pending callbacks at ./drivers/serial are non
> > > > >>> blocking
> > > > >>> - just simple reading from registers and testing flags.
> > > > >>> Hence, it should be enough to not use any timeout from
> > > > >>> timer. One shall also note that we enable console very
> > > > >>> early - not all timers may be ready for work - adding
> > > > >>> timeout here would impose implicit dependency that timers
> > > > >>> are setup before serial.  
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Given that this is effectively a busy polling loop, why can’t
> > > > >> this be done from the probe-function of serial drivers that
> > > > >> require this functionality?  
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be one of the options.
> > > > >
> > > > > Originally, this code was placed at iMX specific function -
> > > > > namely _mxc_serial_init() [1].
> > > > >
> > > > > However, Simon suggested to solve this problem globally via
> > > > > DM's serial-uclass, which offers pre_probe() callback for
> > > > > such purpose.
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem here is the polling loop. I've checked and
> > > > > ->pending on real SoCs is just a read from the register -
> > > > > which should not block (a similar approach is used in Linux
> > > > > kernel).
> > > > >
> > > > > Having timeout from timer would impose dependency on timer
> > > > > init'ed first - before serial.  
> > > >
> > > > I worry a bit about the pending-callback being called prior to a
> > > > probe. As of today, the pending function can assume that
> > > > probe() has run and initialised the private structures
> > > > accordingly—with this change, that assumption is invalidated.  
> > >
> > > Yes. I agree.
> > >
> > > Other issue is that we may need timer based timeout for some
> > > SoCs. And this also implies to have timer initialized before the
> > > console. 
> > > >
> > > > If we go down this path, then we need to clearly indicate that
> > > > the pending function can not rely on probe() to have
> > > > initialised the device state or private data structures.  If we
> > > > keep this check within the probe()-function, it should be
> > > > obvious what is set up and what isn’t.  
> > >
> > > Those are valid arguments.
> > >
> > > I would even go further and leave this patch as it was in the
> > > first version [1] - since:
> > >
> > > - It is similar to what Linux does
> > > - for iMX it uses check on HW bit which is guarantee to be
> > > cleared in some point of time (of course if HW is not broken).
> > >
> > > However, lets wait for input from Simon - how he would like to
> > > tackle this issue.  
> >
> > Unfortunately, I did not received any feedback from Simon.
> >
> > Hence, I would opt for discarding this particular patch and use the
> > v1 of it (please find the rationale above):
> >
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/820824/
> >
> > Has anybody disagree?  
> 
> I think this patch is useful, but I agree it needs to be documented.
> 
> You could add a comment to the pending function in serial.h saying it
> can be called before probe. This would only really work if the driver
> was inited previously though.
> 
> Would it be better instead to have a function in board_f.c somewhere
> which loops on each serial device waiting for the pending function to
> return 0? Then you know that the driver has been probed, and before
> relocation too, so it should be safe.

Hmm... Ok. I will try with this approach.

Thanks for the tip.

> 
> I have seen this problem on other boards so I do favour a generic
> solution if we can figure this out.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> >  
> > >  
> > > >  
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/820824/
> > > > >  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
> > > > >>> ---
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
> > > > >>> b/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c index 2e5116f..5e6964d
> > > > >>> 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
> > > > >>> +++ b/drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c
> > > > >>> @@ -420,10 +420,30 @@ static int serial_pre_remove(struct
> > > > >>> udevice *dev) return 0;
> > > > >>> }
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> +static int serial_pre_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> > > > >>> +{
> > > > >>> +       struct dm_serial_ops *ops = serial_get_ops(dev);
> > > > >>> +       int ret = 0;
> > > > >>> +
> > > > >>> +       /*
> > > > >>> +        * Wait for any ongoing transmission to finish - for
> > > > >>> example
> > > > >>> +        * from pre-relocation enabled UART
> > > > >>> +        */
> > > > >>> +       if (ops && ops->pending)
> > > > >>> +               do {
> > > > >>> +                       ret = ops->pending(dev, false);
> > > > >>> +                       if (ret < 0)
> > > > >>> +                               break;
> > > > >>> +               } while (ret > 0);
> > > > >>> +
> > > > >>> +       return ret;
> > > > >>> +}
> > > > >>> +
> > > > >>> UCLASS_DRIVER(serial) = {
> > > > >>>         .id             = UCLASS_SERIAL,
> > > > >>>         .name           = "serial",
> > > > >>>         .flags          = DM_UC_FLAG_SEQ_ALIAS,
> > > > >>> +       .pre_probe      = serial_pre_probe,
> > > > >>>         .post_probe     = serial_post_probe,
> > > > >>>         .pre_remove     = serial_pre_remove,
> > > > >>>         .per_device_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct
> > > > >>> serial_dev_priv), --
> > > > >>> 2.1.4
> > > > >>>  
> > > > >>  
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Lukasz Majewski
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director:
> > > > > Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5,
> > > > > D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax:
> > > > > (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de  
> > > >  
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Lukasz Majewski
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang
> > > Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194
> > > Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax:
> > > (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de  
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Lukasz Majewski
> >
> > --
> >
> > DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang
> > Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
> > Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email:
> > wd at denx.de  



Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20171105/0cad4378/attachment.sig>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-05 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-26 22:13 [U-Boot] [PATCH] dm: serial: Add .pre_probe() function to to wait for previous transmission end Lukasz Majewski
2017-10-26 22:19 ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-10-26 22:51   ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-10-27 13:34     ` Dr. Philipp Tomsich
2017-10-27 13:57       ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-11-04 21:42         ` Lukasz Majewski
2017-11-05  2:45           ` Simon Glass
2017-11-05 22:16             ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171105231658.1a8bb295@jawa \
    --to=lukma@denx.de \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.