Re: [PATCH v2] USB: add SPDX identifiers to all remaining files in drivers/usb/

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:51:48AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files to make it easier to
> > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses.
> > 
> > Update the drivers/usb/ and include/linux/usb* files with the correct
> > SPDX license identifier based on the license text in the file itself.
> > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used
> > instead of the full boiler plate text.
> > 
> > This work is based on a script and data from Thomas Gleixner, Philippe
> > Ombredanne, and Kate Stewart.
> > 
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> > v2: Use the "standard" format of putting the identifier at the top of
> >     the file, and use // for .c and .h files.
> >     Removed the files already marked in Linus's tree.
> > 
> > Unless someone really complains, I'm going to add this to my tree for
> > 4.15-rc1.
> 
> as you said in some other email... this stands out a bit too
> much.

That is the goal, sorry.

> What about using normal c comments, and put it near the original
> license text? It is not exactly the most important thing...
> 
> Or maybe near the MODULE_LICENSE, so the two don't get out of sync?

No, the top of the file is best, thanks.

And once we get the MODULE_LICENSE in sync with the actual license of
the file (there are tools being written to catch these issues, of which
we have a lot in the current tree), neither should really change any
over time.

thanks,

greg k-h