Re: [PATCH iproute2 2/2] devlink: add batch command support

[Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>]

Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 09:19:23AM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 06:06:42AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:47:35PM CET, leon@kernel.org wrote:
>> >On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 08:10:43AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> >> On 10.11.2017 07:57, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 07:20:14AM +0100, Ivan Vecera wrote:
>> >> >> The patch adds support to batch devlink commands.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
>> >> >> Cc: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com>
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >>  devlink/devlink.c  | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> >> >>  man/man8/devlink.8 | 16 +++++++++++++
>> >> >>  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > <..>
>> >> >
>> >> >> diff --git a/man/man8/devlink.8 b/man/man8/devlink.8
>> >> >> index a480766c..a975ef34 100644
>> >> >> --- a/man/man8/devlink.8
>> >> >> +++ b/man/man8/devlink.8
>> >> >> @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@ devlink \- Devlink tool
>> >> >>  .sp
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  .ti -8
>> >> >> +.B devlink
>> >> >> +.RB "[ " -force " ] "
>> >> >> +.BI "-batch " filename
>> >> >> +.sp
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +.ti -8
>> >> >>  .IR OBJECT " := { "
>> >> >>  .BR dev " | " port " | " monitor " }"
>> >> >>  .sp
>> >> >> @@ -32,6 +38,16 @@ Print the version of the
>> >> >>  utility and exit.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>  .TP
>> >> >> +.BR "\-b", " \-batch " <FILENAME>
>> >> >> +Read commands from provided file or standard input and invoke them.
>> >> >> +First failure will cause termination of devlink.
>> >> >
>> >> > It is worth to document the expected format of that file.
>> >> > And IMHO, it is better to have ability to load JSON fie which was
>> >> > generated by -j, instead of declaring new format/knob.
>> >> It's just a list of command-lines... like other utils (bridge,ip...)
>> >
>> >I'm implementing similar thing in RDMAtool (part of iproute2) and choose JSON
>> >approach, it is more user and script friendly.
>>
>> Leon, we should really do things in a way they are currently done and
>> used. Batching is implemented in "ip" for a long time. It makes perfect
>> sense to have one command line per line of the batch file.
>>
>> In contrary, json output sounds really odd in this case. With json,
>> there is no relation to ordinary ip command line params. Or do you want
>> to extend it to accept json as well?
>
>Yes, I wanted to add new field - "cmd", and whole logic to parse JSON to
>properly rebuild command from that with right parameters and device name.
>
>However, most probably, I'll never finish it near future, so in meanwhile I will
>provide the same batch format as Ivan proposed.

Good. I think it is more than enough for now :) Thanks!


>
>Thanks
>
>>