From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [intel-sgx-kernel-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver documentation Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:47:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20171114194703.eqeaxeqtpvzmkeec@linux.intel.com> References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20171113194528.28557-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <1510628465.8102.11.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:33288 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753115AbdKNTrK (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:47:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1510628465.8102.11.camel@linux.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Kai Huang Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 04:01:05PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote: > Not sure whether you should talk about MEE staff here. They are not in > SDM and (thus) may potentially be changed in the future. The use of MEE is documented in many places like https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/204.pdf I see no reason not to talk about MEE. > IMHO you can just remove this "virtualization" section entirely as your > first upstreaming driver won't consider virtualization at all. > > Thanks, > -Kai Makes sense. /Jarkko