From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Singh, Guneshwor" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/realtek - Enable jack detection for Intel CFL + ALC700 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:28:37 +0530 Message-ID: <20171115025837.GA20938@g2> References: <20171114030008.858-1-guneshwor.o.singh@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CE726751C for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 03:58:42 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: PeiSen Hou , ALSA ML , kailang@realtek.com, CHLin List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:00:08 +0100, > Guneshwor Singh wrote: > > > > From: PeiSen Hou > > > > ALC700 has jack detection disabled by default in Intel Coffeelake > > Reference board. To enable it, this fixup is required. > > > > Signed-off-by: PeiSen Hou > > Signed-off-by: Guneshwor Singh > > --- > > sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > > index 0ce71111b4e3..61ef08173b1c 100644 > > --- a/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > > +++ b/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c > > @@ -5264,6 +5264,7 @@ enum { > > ALC233_FIXUP_LENOVO_MULTI_CODECS, > > ALC294_FIXUP_LENOVO_MIC_LOCATION, > > ALC700_FIXUP_INTEL_REFERENCE, > > + ALC700_FIXUP_INTEL_CFL, > > }; > > > > static const struct hda_fixup alc269_fixups[] = { > > @@ -6074,6 +6075,21 @@ static const struct hda_fixup alc269_fixups[] = { > > {} > > } > > }, > > + [ALC700_FIXUP_INTEL_CFL] = { > > + .type = HDA_FIXUP_VERBS, > > + .v.verbs = (const struct hda_verb[]) { > > + /* Enables internal speaker */ > > + {0x20, AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, 0x45}, > > + {0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x5289}, > > + {0x20, AC_VERB_SET_COEF_INDEX, 0x4a}, > > + {0x20, AC_VERB_SET_PROC_COEF, 0x201b}, > > I see only one bit here is different from the previous quirk for Intel > reference board. Do we really need to keep both quirks separately? > Or maybe this new one is the correct verb in anyway? > > Will check if both are needed. Otherwise the same quirk can be reused (by correcting the older verb if required). Thanks for the review. > thanks, > > Takashi