From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] samples: replace outdated permission statement with SPDX identifiers
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:41:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171116114110.GA5892@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115204411.10292-1-martink@posteo.de>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:44:11PM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> This replaces license permission statements that include a wrong postal
> address of the FSF with only SPDX license identifiers; in the samples
> directory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>
> ---
>
> I'll fold this in, in the thread here. I guess this change is what Greg
> had in mind? Or would you prefer having including SPDX and removing
> permission statement seperately?
I have been doing them in 2 steps, but only because the files I modified
were in different "chunks" (i.e. add missing SPDX identifiers to a bunch
of files in a directory, and then the second patch would remove the
license identifiers for all files in that directory). As that type of
patch flow doesn't make sense here, I think what you did was just fine.
Nice job.
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 9:50 [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-15 6:29 ` Greg KH
2017-11-15 7:46 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-15 8:45 ` Greg KH
2017-11-15 20:44 ` [PATCH] samples: replace outdated permission statement with SPDX identifiers Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-16 11:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-11-17 22:53 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-17 23:43 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-18 0:13 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-11-18 8:33 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-18 10:20 ` Greg KH
2017-11-18 10:17 ` Greg KH
2017-11-18 11:21 ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-11-16 13:56 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2017-11-22 22:23 ` [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171116114110.GA5892@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martink@posteo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.