[Buildroot] Cannot rebuild autobuild

[Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>]

Hello Arnout,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:43:48 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:

> On 16-11-17 08:29, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > ...  
> >>> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'toolchain-external-custom', needed by '.../build-prebuild-toolchain-001/build/toolchain-external/.stamp_configured'.  Stop.
> >>> make: *** [Makefile:16: _all] Error 2  
> >   
> >>> The error occurs  before the prebuild toolchain is downloaded/extracted...  
> >   
> >>  That is really weird, the toolchain-external-custom dependencies should be
> >> defined no matter what... Could you pastebin the output make 'make -qp' somewhere?  
> > Here it is:
> > http://sipe.cz/buildroot/out.log (68M)
> > http://sipe.cz/buildroot/out.log.tar.gz (9MB)  
> 
>  Oh boy...
> 
>  The problem is that on Tumbleweed the order of inclusion seems to be different,
> which causes toolchain-external-package not to be defined at the time that
> toolchain-external-custom.mk is included (same for all other external toolchains).
> 
> Makefile:492:include toolchain/*/*.mk
> 
> This causes inclusion of
> toolchain/toolchain-external/toolchain-external.mk:28:include
> toolchain/toolchain-external/*/*.mk
> and
> toolchain/toolchain-external/pkg-toolchain-external.mk:592:toolchain-external-package
> = ...
> 
>  If the *.mk is expanded in alphabetical order, pkg-toolchain-external.mk will
> always come before toolchain-external.mk. Otherwise it is possible (depending on
> the state of hash tables or inode numbers or whatever) that
> toolchain-external-custom.mk gets included first.

According to this [1] it is a change from the used gnu-make version (on Tumpbleweed
GNU Make 4.2.1 is used)?

Regards,
Peter

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40558385/gnu-make-wildcard-no-longer-gives-sorted-output-is-there-any-control-switch

> 
>  The short-term solution is of course $(sort $(wildcard ...))
> 
>  But for the long term, I think it's better to move pkg-*.mk to support/misc (or
> maybe to support/make) and organise the order of inclusion from there.
> 
>  Any takers? Yann?
> 
>  Regards,
>  Arnout
>