From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_running' in POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 18:54:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121185457.GA2913@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87vai3pj9e.fsf@secure.mitica>
* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > When migrating a VM with 'migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on'
> > a postcopy_state is set during the process, ending up with the
> > state POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END when the migration is over. This
> > postcopy_state is taken into account inside ram_load to check
> > how it will load the memory pages. This same ram_load is called when
> > in a loadvm command.
> >
> > Inside ram_load, the logic to see if we're at postcopy_running state
> > is:
> >
> > postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING
> >
> > postcopy_state_get() returns this enum type:
> >
> > typedef enum {
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_NONE = 0,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_DISCARD,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_RUNNING,
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END
> > } PostcopyState;
> >
> > In the case where ram_load is executed and postcopy_state is
> > POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END, postcopy_running will be set to 'true' and
> > ram_load will behave like a postcopy is in progress. This scenario isn't
> > achievable in a migration but it is reproducible when executing
> > savevm/loadvm after migrating with 'postcopy-ram on', causing loadvm
> > to fail with Error -22:
> >
> > Source:
> >
> > (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> > (qemu) migrate tcp:127.0.0.1:4444
> >
> > Dest:
> >
> > (qemu) migrate_set_capability postcopy-ram on
> > (qemu)
> > ubuntu1704-intel login:
> > Ubuntu 17.04 ubuntu1704-intel ttyS0
> >
> > ubuntu1704-intel login: (qemu)
> > (qemu) savevm test1
> > (qemu) loadvm test1
> > Unknown combination of migration flags: 0x4 (postcopy mode)
> > error while loading state for instance 0x0 of device 'ram'
> > Error -22 while loading VM state
> > (qemu)
> >
> > This patch fixes this problem by changing a bit the semantics
> > of postcopy_running inside ram_load, verifying first if
> > we're not in the POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END state. In this case,
> > postcopy_running is set to 'false'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
>
> queued
Wrong version; v3 is:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-11/msg03188.html
Dave
> > ---
> > migration/ram.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> > index 8620aa400a..43ed719668 100644
> > --- a/migration/ram.c
> > +++ b/migration/ram.c
> > @@ -2803,13 +2803,21 @@ static int ram_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
> > int flags = 0, ret = 0, invalid_flags = 0;
> > static uint64_t seq_iter;
> > int len = 0;
> > - /*
> > - * If system is running in postcopy mode, page inserts to host memory must
> > - * be atomic
> > - */
> > - bool postcopy_running = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING;
> > - /* ADVISE is earlier, it shows the source has the postcopy capability on */
> > - bool postcopy_advised = postcopy_state_get() >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE;
> > + bool postcopy_advised = false, postcopy_running = false;
> > + uint8_t postcopy_state = postcopy_state_get();
> > +
> > + if (postcopy_state != POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END) {
> > + /*
> > + * If system is running in postcopy mode, page inserts to host memory
> > + * must be atomic
> > + */
> > + postcopy_running = postcopy_state >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING;
> > +
> > + /* ADVISE is earlier, it shows the source has the postcopy
> > + * capability on
> > + */
> > + postcopy_advised = postcopy_state >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_ADVISE;
> > + }
> >
> > seq_iter++;
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-10 20:35 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] migration/ram.c: do not set 'postcopy_running' in POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END Daniel Henrique Barboza
2017-11-13 3:22 ` Peter Xu
2017-11-13 11:39 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2017-11-21 18:41 ` Juan Quintela
2017-11-21 18:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2017-11-22 8:22 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171121185457.GA2913@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=danielhb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.