From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHoMN-0000MW-OK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:04:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHoMK-0000CK-LL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:03:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHoMK-0000Bf-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 05:03:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:03:45 +0100 From: Cornelia Huck Message-ID: <20171123110345.03541b50.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <715a7bd1-7aa5-fa64-a9b8-76782ee20576@redhat.com> References: <20171110152017.24324-1-clg@kaod.org> <20171110152017.24324-2-clg@kaod.org> <715a7bd1-7aa5-fa64-a9b8-76782ee20576@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? (was: [PATCH for-2.12 v3 01/11] spapr: add pseries 2.12 machine type) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Q8OpZHJpYw==?= Le Goater , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson , Greg Kurz , Peter Maydell On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:14:28 +0100 Thomas Huth wrote: > By the way, before everybody now introduces "2.12" machine types ... is > there already a consensus that the next version will be "2.12" ? > > A couple of months ago, we discussed that we could maybe do a 3.0 after > 2.11, e.g. here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg05056.html > > I'd still like to see that happen... Peter, any thoughts on this? So, as I just thought about preparing the new machine for s390x as well: Did we reach any consensus about what the next qemu version will be called?